The Stable Genius shows off

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Actually, this was....but you let this one slide.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, He and SD consistently reach as low as possible. Jim insults everyone constantly also.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

No, He and SD consistently reach as low as possible. Jim insults everyone constantly also.

(1) how many times have you insulted me, Paul? But somehow it’s always ok when you do it.

(2) I insult people in response to them insulting others. if you can point to where i’ve directly gone after someone’s children or parents, i apologize. But i’d bet everything i have that i’ve never done it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

(1) how many times have you insulted me, Paul? But somehow it’s always ok when you do it. Show me one post where I insulted you w/o you whining about Liberals?

(2) I insult people in response to them insulting others. if you can point to where i’ve directly gone after someone’s children or parents, i apologize. But i’d bet everything i have that i’ve never done it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

But, I will state you never insulted someone's children/spouse (like SD) but you constantly insult liberals for no reason other to throw an insult out.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

But, I will state you never insulted someone's children/spouse (like SD) but you constantly insult liberals for no reason other to throw an insult out.

you’ve called me angry god knows how many times. it’s what intellectual wimps do when (1) they can’t respond to the case you’ve made, and (2) can’t admit you might have a point.

Paul, i also like jousting with you most of the time, but your differing rules depending on party are becoming much more glaring. Be a bit less like Pete and a bit more like ririckhound.

I dont believe i insult specific people here for no reason. i do it when i have a terrific reason.

You desperately try to make me out to be a blind conservative partisan. it’s not close to true. but you play that card anyway. there have been plenty of posts here where i’ve sided with liberals, i have been in the exact opposite side of issues with Scott and detbuch and SD. but i can disagree with them respectfully. you guys make it very tough.

when pete says it was ok for obama to our kids in cages but a crime against humanity when Trump does it ( based solely on the basis that trump does it more often), rational conversation isn’t possible.

when you deny any rational inference that Hunters job could be related to who his dad was, rational conversation is difficult.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you’ve called me angry god knows how many times. it’s what intellectual wimps do when (1) they can’t respond to the case you’ve made, and (2) can’t admit you might have a point. You want me to pull up a few of your vile posts - and many are not w/o anything close to that by who your insulting.

Paul, i also like jousting with you most of the time, but your differing rules depending on party are becoming much more glaring. Be a bit less like Pete and a bit more like ririckhound.

I dont believe i insult specific people here for no reason. i do it when i have a terrific reason.You constantly liberals are this and liberals are that. Yet for some reason don't think it is insulting.

You desperately try to make me out to be a blind conservative partisan. it’s not close to true. but you play that card anyway. there have been plenty of posts here where i’ve sided with liberals, i have been in the exact opposite side of issues with Scott and detbuch and SD. but i can disagree with them respectfully. you guys make it very tough.

when pete says it was ok for obama to our kids in cages but a crime against humanity when Trump does it ( based solely on the basis that trump does it more often), rational conversation isn’t possible. Trump had a blanket policy to do it to all children. Obama's policy was to do it where they weren't sure if the child was with their parent or other similar reason so it wasn't the same.

when you deny any rational inference that Hunters job could be related to who his dad was, rational conversation is difficult.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I never said Hunter didn't get the job bc of this dad. That is not a crime. Would it be proper for the DOJ to announce an investigation into Trump for pedo. bc Epstein was a pedo and Trump is on camara saying he hung out w/Epstein liked "young girls"?

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I never said Hunter didn't get the job bc of this dad. That is not a crime.

No
But it is the very definition of nepotism. Which you say did not happen in a different thread. You epitomize the looney,lying left.
🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

No
But it is the very definition of nepotism. Which you say did not happen in a different thread. You epitomize the looney,lying left.
������
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So who at Burisma is Hunter's relative? I gave you the definition of Nepotism which showed you are totally wrong.

You epitomize the uneducated vile right who think they are right when they are wrong. You don't have anything to add so you throw childish insults out.

[falkners]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

No
But it is the very definition of nepotism. Which you say did not happen in a different thread. You epitomize the looney,lying left.
🤡🤡🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

By definition:
Nepotism is the granting of jobs to one's relatives or friends in various fields, including business, politics, entertainment, sports, religion and other activities. Nepotism is the act of using one's power to secure better jobs or unfair advantages for a family member when they may not have the right skill, experience or motivation compared to others.

Hunter Biden getting the job was not by definition nepotism. He, perhaps, was given the job by Barisma so that they could gain favor from the then current administration. This was never alleged or proven. Donald Trump appointing his daughter and son-in-law to positions, however, IS nepotism, since neither one was qualified to have their positions. One should question why Jared, who is making Middle East Policy, got hundreds of millions of dollars of financing for his 666 building on the verge of bankruptsy, from the very people who the policies he is advocating for when virtually no one was willing to lend him money. The financial conflict of interest there is undeniable. The fact that they aren't getting a salary, is a moot point considering they are both receiving huge financial benefits by their association with the administration.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by PaulS

No, He and SD consistently reach as low as possible. Jim insults everyone constantly also.

Nobody here ever reached that low. Nobody. He basically referred to someone’s mother as a pregnant, drugged out whore. If he said that in person he should have been shown the floor. Pretty disgusting if you ask me.

But you agree with him on politics so it’s A-Ok.

You disagree with SD and Jim on politics, so you call them out almost immediately for insults that pale in comparison

Next time you throw out the word hypocrite, remember this thread.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Nobody here ever reached that low. Nobody. He basically referred to someone’s mother as a pregnant, drugged out whore. If he said that in person he should have been shown the floor. Pretty disgusting if you ask me.

But you agree with him on politics so it’s A-Ok.

You disagree with SD and Jim on politics, so you call them out almost immediately for insults that pale in comparison

Next time you throw out the word hypocrite, remember this thread.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I appreciate that, but it’s ok. his post obviously says nothing about my mom, and obviously says everything about him.

Thanks TDF, really.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Nobody here ever reached that low. Nobody. He basically referred to someone’s mother as a pregnant, drugged out whore. If he said that in person he should have been shown the floor. Pretty disgusting if you ask me.

But you agree with him on politics so it’s A-Ok.

You disagree with SD and Jim on politics, so you call them out almost immediately for insults that pale in comparison

Next time you throw out the word hypocrite, remember this thread.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You're right it is not appropriate but the people on the right here constantly throw around insults so when someone responds I think they are justified. You're a moderator but why have a moderator when nothing is too low here and you don't do a thing about it?

You want me to point out your hypocrisy. Remember when I posted about the coast guard cadets and you pointed out if was really CG "members" as if that really makes a difference. Then the next day you complained that Spence did something similar to what you did. That is hypocrisy.

I laugh how you really never post anything of substance but lurk and throw out little jabs or memes.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You're right it is not appropriate but the people on the right here constantly throw around insults so when someone responds I think they are justified. You're a moderator but why have a moderator when nothing is too low here and you don't do a thing about it?

You want me to point out your hypocrisy. Remember when I posted about the coast guard cadets and you pointed out if was really CG "members" as if that really makes a difference. Then the next day you complained that Spence did something similar to what you did. That is hypocrisy.

I laugh how you really never post anything of substance but lurk and throw out little jabs or memes.

so i had it coming, because pete was responding to my insults.

All i did, was ask him exactly how
many times it’s ok to put kids in cages, before it becomes immoral.

Let’s recap, shall we?

Pete: it was immoral for trump
to put kids in cages.

Jim: Obama did it first, obama built the facilities with cages.

Pete: Trump did it more often.

Jim: so what’s the maximum number of kids you can put in cages, before it becomes immoral?

Pete: your mother was a paint sniffing prostitute.

TDF: that’s a new low

Paul: Pete was just responding to Jim’s insults.


sound about right, paul and pete?

Your slipping paul. i know SD yanks your chain pretty good. But you’re slipping.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so i had it coming, because pete was responding to my insults.

All i did, was ask him exactly how
many times it’s ok to put kids in cages, before it becomes immoral.

Let’s recap, shall we?

Pete: it was immoral for trump
to put kids in cages.

Jim: Obama did it first, obama built the facilities with cages.

Pete: Trump did it more often.

Jim: so what’s the maximum number of kids you can put in cages, before it becomes immoral?

Pete: your mother was a paint sniffing prostitute.

TDF: that’s a new low

Paul: Pete was just responding to Jim’s insults.


sound about right, paul and pete?

Your slipping paul. i know SD yanks your chain pretty good. But you’re slipping.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't think he yanks my chain at all.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I don't think he yanks my chain at all.

you tell him pretty regularly that you don’t care for him, that’s all i meant. you also seemed to miss the point of everything else i just posted.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you tell him pretty regularly that you don’t care for him, that’s all i meant. you also seemed to miss the point of everything else i just posted.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, I don't think I do.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Pete, i immediately concede Trump gets an F on debt.

Now, please tell us why it was OK for obama to put kids in cages, but wrong for trump to do it.

If I said obama was bad for running up the debt but i have Trump a pass, Id be a hypocrite. I’ve said 100 times he’s failing on the debt.

You are the hypocrite, giving Obama a pass for caging kids but bashing Trump for putting kids in the same exact cages that obama used.

It was Nobel Peace Prize- worthy when Obama did it, and a crime against humanity when Trump does it.

No one cared when Obama
did it, and for damn sure no one said “it’s ok at these numbers, but President Obama if you increase the number of
kids you put in cages, then i will oppose you.”

Not one single human being said that. You’re saying it now to justify the naked hypocrisy.

Do you ever get tired of getting bitch slapped around?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You're in the wrong thread, so tell me did you work hard to be this much of a moron, or are you the product of a combination of enthusiastic inbreeding and a mother who spent her pregnancy huffing paint thinner while servicing her other clients in a truckstop bathroom?

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i know i’m on a different thread, but you keep
ignoring the other one, so uncovering more bases.

When i ask you to explain the inconsistency in your view of putting kids in cages, and all you can do is call me a moron, i’ve won.

you just can’t ever admit that a liberal was wrong or a conservative was right. You’re physically incapable of it. And i’m the moron.

So tell us, what’s the maximum number of times you can put kids in cages, before you forfeit your Noble Peace Prize and stand trial
at Nuremberg, anyway?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You're like a dog with a pull toy, go read the other threads..........

I'm not going to spend the time to put up the documents on the difference between the previous admins and this one.

He'll be gone soon, he's backed up to the sea right now.

"If you lie to the court, there are penalties for that."

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann explains the possible downsides for the White House if it pursues the claim of executive privilege

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i read the other threads. Nowhere did you state what the maximum number of allowable cagings is, before one becomes a
monster.

i’ll just assume
that you don’t have an answer, but you know it’s one more than obama did.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F.

It’s choosing to take ALL the children from the parents, every single one that’s the problem.
You’ve said before that they deserve it. Shouldn’t have brought their children.
Go chase your tail........
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

again, it’s ok to take some, or
most, but not all?

Makes all kinds of sense.

I’m chasing nothing. I’m leading you around by the nose.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so i had it coming, because pete was responding to my insults.

All i did, was ask him exactly how
many times it’s ok to put kids in cages, before it becomes immoral.

Let’s recap, shall we?

Pete: it was immoral for trump
to put kids in cages.

Jim: Obama did it first, obama built the facilities with cages.

Pete: Trump did it more often.

Jim: so what’s the maximum number of kids you can put in cages, before it becomes immoral?

Pete: your mother was a paint sniffing prostitute.

TDF: that’s a new low

Paul: Pete was just responding to Jim’s insults.


sound about right, paul and pete?

Your slipping paul. i know SD yanks your chain pretty good. But you’re slipping.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Read it for yourself

You chased me from one thread to another trying to bring me down to your level.

Not afraid to call me a Jew hater, Omar or other names because I quoted Ilan Goldenberg or dared to criticize Floridaman's latest stupidity. Definitely demonstrated your prejudices once again.

So congratulations, I'm glad you have impressed yourself and the rest of the Trumplicans.

Now go chase your tail

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Read it for yourself

You chased me from one thread to another trying to bring me down to your level.

Not afraid to call me a Jew hater, Omar or other names because I quoted Ilan Goldenberg or dared to criticize Floridaman's latest stupidity. Definitely demonstrated your prejudices once again.

So congratulations, I'm glad you have impressed yourself and the rest of the Trumplicans.

Now go chase your tail

"You chased me from one thread to another trying to bring me down to your level"

Because you said that what distinguishes Trump from Obama in terms of kids in cages is the number of times he did it, I merely asked you what the magic number is. How many is OK, how many is too many? Obviously that's an insane argument, and you know you aren't going to be able to come up with any threshold which a child wouldn't laugh at, so you went at my mother.

I was trying to get you to clarify your stated position. That's bringing you down to my level? Makes no sense...

"Not afraid to call me a Jew hater"

You said that it's problematic for Jews to work on a Mideast peace treaty, and you said it was "gross" that only Jews were on the stage. Your words. Sounds anti-Semitic to me. And I don't play the bigot card regularly.


"I'm glad you have impressed yourself and the rest of the Trumplicans"

TDF is a Trumplican now?? Wow. When you have to call HIM a Trumplican, that shows you how deep into the Twilight Zone you are.

Take a deep breath. TDF is one of the most level-headed and nonpartisan guys here. He really is. Think about what he said to you, and why he of all people, felt compelled to say it. He's not me or SD, he doesn't come out here looking to stir the pot. Ask yourself what you had to do, to trigger that reaction from someone who everyone would say is fair and level-headed.

I'd say you and I are about done on this forum. You're a predictable, thoughtless, mean-spirited, vulgar, cowardly, bitter, desperate, deeply and pathetically insecure, pimple of a person. And every single person here knows it. You have an awful lot in common, with the guy you spend every waking second trying to criticize. Very little daylight between you and Trump. Kind of funny when you look at it that way.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"


I'd say you and I are about done on this forum. You're a predictable, thoughtless, mean-spirited, vulgar, cowardly, bitter, desperate, deeply and pathetically insecure, pimple of a person. And every single person here knows it. You have an awful lot in common, with the guy you spend every waking second trying to criticize. Very little daylight between you and Trump. Kind of funny when you look at it that way.

Yes, you're not an angry person. He takes more crap here than anyone.

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Read it for yourself

You chased me from one thread to another trying to bring me down to your level.

Not afraid to call me a Jew hater, Omar or other names because I quoted Ilan Goldenberg or dared to criticize Floridaman's latest stupidity. Definitely demonstrated your prejudices once again.

So congratulations, I'm glad you have impressed yourself and the rest of the Trumplicans.

Now go chase your tail

If you had the courage to answer his question he wouldn’t have to chase you. Keep cherry picking facts and making a fool of yourself. Silly liberal.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device