| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-24-2020, 10:46 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
a bill which turned out to be a flop. even obama joked that it didn’t work.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
saved the auto industry - didn't it?
Then why didn't the Repubs. make some substantive suggestions?
And you're still worried about a joke Obama made 10 years ago. - Post up what he said bc it wasn't that it didn't work.
How Well It Succeeded
In a 2009 report, the CBO projected ARRA would stimulate gross domestic product by 1.4% to 3.8% for the fourth quarter in 2009.[7] The stimulus was successful in 2009 GDP. The economy grew 1.7% in the third quarter and 3.8% in the fourth quarter. That's a big improvement over the first quarter's 6.7% drop and the second quarter's 0.7% decline.[8]
In 2009, the CBO predicted that ARRA would increase employment by 7 million full-time jobs by the end of 2012.[9] By 2010, the CBO said that ARRA's policies increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 2 million to 4.8 million.[10
|
|
|
|
|
03-24-2020, 11:13 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
saved the auto industry - didn't it?
Then why didn't the Repubs. make some substantive suggestions?
And you're still worried about a joke Obama made 10 years ago. - Post up what he said bc it wasn't that it didn't work.
How Well It Succeeded
In a 2009 report, the CBO projected ARRA would stimulate gross domestic product by 1.4% to 3.8% for the fourth quarter in 2009.[7] The stimulus was successful in 2009 GDP. The economy grew 1.7% in the third quarter and 3.8% in the fourth quarter. That's a big improvement over the first quarter's 6.7% drop and the second quarter's 0.7% decline.[8]
In 2009, the CBO predicted that ARRA would increase employment by 7 million full-time jobs by the end of 2012.[9] By 2010, the CBO said that ARRA's policies increased the number of full-time-equivalent jobs by 2 million to 4.8 million.[10
|
the earlier bailouts saved the auto industry.
obama promised his stimulus would
keep unemployment below 8% (maybe he promised it would stay below 6%, can’t remember?). . after it passed, unemployment went over 10%.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
03-24-2020, 12:34 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,479
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the earlier bailouts saved the auto industry.
obama promised his stimulus would
keep unemployment below 8% (maybe he promised it would stay below 6%, can’t remember?). . after it passed, unemployment went over 10%.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the stimulus probably did far less than the Democrats in Washington would like to believe. But I also think it borders on absurd to say that it did nothing.
can see this repeating with this package when passed
|
|
|
|
|
03-24-2020, 12:40 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
the earlier bailouts saved the auto industry.
obama promised his stimulus would
keep unemployment below 8% (maybe he promised it would stay below 6%, can’t remember?). . after it passed, unemployment went over 10%.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So it looks like you agree it wasn't large enough. The Dems. kept lowering the $ at the suggestions (demands?) of the Repubs. and then the Repubs didn't vote for it.
|
|
|
|
|
03-25-2020, 12:56 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So it looks like you agree it wasn't large enough. The Dems. kept lowering the $ at the suggestions (demands?) of the Repubs. and then the Repubs didn't vote for it.
|
nooo, I said it didn't work as it was promised it would. Unlike liberals such as yourself, I don't assume that spending more money always makes things better.
Obama did other things that worked well. I've said 100 times I think Obama gets good grades on handling the economy. I think the recovery act was a flop, I think the empirical results, compared to promises, make that clear. More importantly is that overall he helped guide us way, way back from a horrible recession.
|
|
|
|
|
03-25-2020, 01:02 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
nooo, I said it didn't work as it was promised it would. Unlike liberals such as yourself, I don't assume that spending more money always makes things better.Have I ever said that?
Obama did other things that worked well. I've said 100 times I think Obama gets good grades on handling the economy. I think the recovery act was a flop, I think the empirical results, compared to promises, make that clear. More importantly is that overall he helped guide us way, way back from a horrible recession.
|
I showed you facts that indicated it did lower unemployment.
|
|
|
|
|
03-25-2020, 01:45 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I showed you facts that indicated it did lower unemployment.
|
Yes, you did say that. You said the fact it's flawed, means it should have been a bigger (more expensive) government program.
I never said unemployment didn't eventually go down after that act was passed. WHat I said, and I'm 100% correct, is that Obama promised unemployment would stay below 8% (or maybe 6%) if it passed, but then after it passed, unemployment went over 10%. Therefore, the program didn't come close to doing what it was touted to do.
|
|
|
|
|
03-25-2020, 02:12 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,323
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Yes, you did say that. You said the fact it's flawed, means it should have been a bigger (more expensive) government program.
I never said unemployment didn't eventually go down after that act was passed. WHat I said, and I'm 100% correct, is that Obama promised unemployment would stay below 8% (or maybe 6%) if it passed, but then after it passed, unemployment went over 10%. Therefore, the program didn't come close to doing what it was touted to do.
|
You said that "Unlike liberals such as yourself, I don't assume that spending more money always makes things better". I asked you if I ever said that? So you can't point out where I said spending money always makes things better. As you have said - How about a thread of honesty.
So it made things better but less than Obama said and that makes it a flop?
|
|
|
|
|
03-25-2020, 12:57 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So it looks like you agree it wasn't large enough. The Dems. kept lowering the $ at the suggestions (demands?) of the Repubs. and then the Repubs didn't vote for it.
|
How did the GOP have the clout to demand anything then? The dems controlled the white house, the house, and the senate.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.
|
| |