|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
09-17-2010, 03:17 PM
|
#1
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit
Since the primaries the Dems have lost 38 members so far to wanting the tax
cuts rescinded.
|
I'm confused..
how do the dems lose someone in the primaries? do you mean an incumbent dem lost to another dem? if so, good. some turnover and balance would be good.
Second, does the average small business make 233K? or is that the average take home of the owner? Big difference.
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
09-17-2010, 09:59 PM
|
#2
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Second, does the average small business make 233K? or is that the average take home of the owner? Big difference.
|
RRH, that is average take home pay of the owner or CEO of a small business.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 08:50 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit
RRH, that is average take home pay of the owner or CEO of a small business.
|
It's important to note that the small business owner taking home 233K in this example would still have the Bush tax cut under the Dem plan. It's only the portion of income over 250k that would be subject to the old rate.
Put into this perspective the tax plan really does only significantly impact very high earners.
-spence
|
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 10:41 AM
|
#4
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
It's important to note that the small business owner taking home 233K in this example would still have the Bush tax cut under the Dem plan. It's only the portion of income over 250k that would be subject to the old rate.
Put into this perspective the tax plan really does only significantly impact very high earners.
-spence
|
Spence, from my understanding a person filing a single return would have
an increase if making $200,000 while those filing jointly would have an increase
if over $250,000 in income.
With most husband and wife working,and filing jointly it wouldn't take much for the small business man
averaging $233 K to reach the $250 K and that's just based on average.
In today's economy I wouldn't consider $200 K or even $250 K RICH
for the average family of 4.
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 01:50 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit
Spence, from my understanding a person filing a single return would have
an increase if making $200,000 while those filing jointly would have an increase
if over $250,000 in income.
With most husband and wife working,and filing jointly it wouldn't take much for the small business man
averaging $233 K to reach the $250 K and that's just based on average.
In today's economy I wouldn't consider $200 K or even $250 K RICH
for the average family of 4.
|
Yes, I was assuming a joint filing. I wouldn't consider 250k to be rich either, but that wasn't the point...it's that the increase only comes into play above that amount.
Additionally, higher wage earners (and I would consider 250k to be a higher wage earner) who pay most of the taxes are also getting the same tax cuts afforded to the middle class.
So even though the top 2% would see their top rate increase a bit, the majority of the "Middle Class Tax Cut" is still going to the top 2%. This is important because this money if not offset by spending cuts (HAHA!) contributes to the deficit right?
The biggest group to be impacted by the tax change would be those earning 500K (rich yet?) and compared to their entire liability isn't a really big % change.
-spence
|
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 04:19 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gloucester Massachusetts
Posts: 2,678
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yes, I was assuming a joint filing. I wouldn't consider 250k to be rich either, but that wasn't the point...it's that the increase only comes into play above that amount.
Additionally, higher wage earners (and I would consider 250k to be a higher wage earner) who pay most of the taxes are also getting the same tax cuts afforded to the middle class.
So even though the top 2% would see their top rate increase a bit, the majority of the "Middle Class Tax Cut" is still going to the top 2%. This is important because this money if not offset by spending cuts (HAHA!) contributes to the deficit right?
The biggest group to be impacted by the tax change would be those earning 500K (rich yet?) and compared to their entire liability isn't a really big % change.
-spence
|
Are you a CPA?
|
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 04:24 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fly Rod
Are you a CPA?
|
No, but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn Express last night
This is from what I've read about the proposals. There have been numerous studies done by various groups.
-spence
|
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 04:29 PM
|
#8
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The biggest group to be impacted by the tax change would be those earning 500K (rich yet?) and compared to their entire liability isn't a really big % change.
-spence
|
Remains to be seen, but this is nothing more then politics as usual.
Make it sound like the Middle Class is getting a break and pit them
against those evil rich people that create the jobs.
Back to my original question--- "Why would you want to expand your business
so you can pay more personal income tax?"
|
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 06:18 PM
|
#9
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by justplugit
Back to my original question--- "Why would you want to expand your business
so you can pay more personal income tax?"
|
NO, I'll hire illegals
|
|
|
|
09-18-2010, 04:28 PM
|
#10
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
It's important to note that the small business owner taking home 233K in this example would still have the Bush tax cut under the Dem plan. It's only the portion of income over 250k that would be subject to the old rate.
Put into this perspective the tax plan really does only significantly impact very high earners.
-spence
|
Sole Prop's are screwed any way. I don't think it's just take home. as all income is taxed, somebody who has a saole prop. chime in.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 AM.
|
| |