|  | 
      
        |  |  |  |  
        |  |  
 
    
      |  |  |  |  
    |  | 
	
		
        
         
 
	
		| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |  
	
	
	
	
		|  11-28-2011, 04:01 PM | #1 |  
	| Permanently Disconnected 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 
					Posts: 12,647
				 | 
				
				Coincidence?
			 
 |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  11-28-2011, 05:05 PM | #2 |  
	| Retired Surfer 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2000 Location: Sunset Grill 
					Posts: 9,511
				 | Someone is killing about one nuke scientist a week in Iran.  I wonder who?  They got two in one car last week. |  
| 
 
Swimmer a.k.a. YO YO MASerial Mailbox Killer/Seal Fisherman
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  11-28-2011, 06:53 PM | #3 |  
	| ........ 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2002 
					Posts: 22,805
				 | keep up the good work |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  11-28-2011, 07:28 PM | #4 |  
	| Old Guy 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Mansfield, MA 
					Posts: 8,760
				 | It's Obama's fault |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 03:51 PM | #5 |  
	| Permanently Disconnected 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 
					Posts: 12,647
				 |  |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 05:05 PM | #6 |  
	| ........ 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2002 
					Posts: 22,805
				 |  |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 06:50 PM | #7 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: RI 
					Posts: 21,501
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by striperman36  It's Obama's fault |  Probably Israelis with covert US intel.
 
So yes, it just may be Obama's fault. You've got to admit, some of this stuff like STUXNET has been really brilliant.
 
-spence |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 06:52 PM | #8 |  
	| Old Guy 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Mansfield, MA 
					Posts: 8,760
				 | STUXNET is the future of warfare |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 07:02 PM | #9 |  
	| Registered Grandpa 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: east coast 
					Posts: 8,592
				 | Let's just hope we can target the downed drone. |  
| 
 
" Choose Life "
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 07:03 PM | #10 |  
	| BuzzLuck 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Brockton 
					Posts: 6,414
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Raven   |  MOPs...  |  
| 
 
 Given the diversity of the human species, there is no “normal” human genome sequence. We are all mutants.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 07:05 PM | #11 |  
	| Old Guy 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Mansfield, MA 
					Posts: 8,760
				 |  |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 07:12 PM | #12 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Libtardia 
					Posts: 21,719
				 | Definately Israel.Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
 |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 08:56 PM | #13 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: RI 
					Posts: 21,501
				 | I'm sure Iran would rather play cat and mouse with special forces than be cleaned up with a MOP. That thing has to be a mother...
 Hypersonic weapons are going to be the future. We'll launch them from geostationary orbit or moon bases and eliminate any target in 45 minutes.
 
 -spence
 |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 09:34 PM | #14 |  
	| Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2000 Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill 
					Posts: 35,379
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by spence  I'm sure Iran would rather play cat and mouse with special forces than be cleaned up with a MOP. That thing has to be a mother...
 Hypersonic weapons are going to be the future. We'll launch them from geostationary orbit or moon bases and eliminate any target in 45 minutes.
 
 -spence
 |  Ground launch from very specific locations and flight profiles so as NOT to be confused with a ballistic nuke and not from space to prevent significant (additional) weaponization of space. You just don't know what it will look like on the other guys screen. (Though the moon base comment has me thinking there is some T.I.C. going on)
 
Prompt Global Strike NOT from a ballistic missile nor from space. |  
| 
 
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~ 
 Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
 
 
 Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
 
 Apocalypse is Coming:
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 09:56 PM | #15 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: RI 
					Posts: 21,501
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by JohnR  Ground launch from very specific locations and flight profiles so as NOT to be confused with a ballistic nuke and not from space to prevent significant (additional) weaponization of space. You just don't know what it will look like on the other guys screen. (Though the moon base comment has me thinking there is some T.I.C. going on)
 Prompt Global Strike NOT from a ballistic missile nor from space.
 |  Moon bases might be a way off...
 
But the advantages of space based weapons over flight launched are significant once the packages get smaller. We don't need the Fifth Fleet on the same mission if we can target Africa to Asia from the same platform.
 
Agree weaponization of space is a slippery slope, but it's got to be  coming regardless. Not that that's necessarily a good thing.
 
-spence |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 10:16 PM | #16 |  
	| Old Guy 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Mansfield, MA 
					Posts: 8,760
				 | Air to surface hypersonic weapons firstPosted from my iPhone/Mobile device
 |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 10:25 PM | #17 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: RI 
					Posts: 21,501
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by striperman36  Air to surface hypersonic weapons firstPosted from my iPhone/Mobile device
 |  Yes, but...slippery slope.
 
-spence |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-05-2011, 10:27 PM | #18 |  
	| Old Guy 
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Mansfield, MA 
					Posts: 8,760
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by spence  Yes, but...slippery slope.
 -spence
 |  Compared to nukes? no, X35 scramjet is a hypersonic kinetic cruise missile. |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 11:14 AM | #21 |  
	| Registered Grandpa 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: east coast 
					Posts: 8,592
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by spence  Agree weaponization of space is a slippery slope, but it's got to be  coming regardless. Not that that's necessarily a good thing.
 
 -spence
 |  For sure. Just like all the preventive measures of nuclear proliferation 
have failed over the last 30 years. |  
| 
 
" Choose Life "
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 11:27 AM | #22 |  
	| Registered Grandpa 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: east coast 
					Posts: 8,592
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Saltys  Carpet bombing is still an option  |  Can't believe the drone went down without us knowing imediately 
where and when. With satelite observation how can that not be? 
 IMHO, we need to destroy it with whatever it takes, 
to knock it out. 
 Too much future danger from that kind of stolen tech. |  
| 
 
" Choose Life "
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 12:58 PM | #23 |  
	| Permanently Disconnected 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 
					Posts: 12,647
				 | I can't believe HOW they did it. I read an article yesterday that detailed from an Iraqi general how they got to it. It's ridiculously stupidly simple. 
HEADS SHOULD ROLL on who approved a NON SECURE link to control the things and why didn't they have a self destruct device (which probably wouldnt have helped here unless they blew it on the ground which is improbable.
 
All they did was jam the main contact frequency, then spoof the gps coordinates and terrain height. So when the drone loses signal it's auto programmed to return to base and land. Cept this time it landed in Iran.
 
$1 million down the effin tubes because of poor design..    
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by justplugit  Can't believe the drone went down without us knowing imediatelywhere and when. With satelite observation how can that not be?
 IMHO, we need to destroy it with whatever it takes,
 to knock it out.
 Too much future danger from that kind of stolen tech.
 |  |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 01:34 PM | #24 |  
	| Super Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Georgetown MA 
					Posts: 18,225
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&  $1 million down the effin tubes because of poor design..   |  Not the design that was poor...it was the security that was poor. Ain't that difficult to encrypt data on a signal
				 Last edited by The Dad Fisherman; 12-16-2011 at 02:41 PM..
					
					
						Reason: Clarfy statement...data is encrypted, signal is raw
 |  
| 
 
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 01:49 PM | #25 |  
	| Permanently Disconnected 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 
					Posts: 12,647
				 | isn't that part of the design? |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 01:54 PM | #26 |  
	| Permanently Disconnected 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 
					Posts: 12,647
				 | The idea of what they did exploits the fact that gps is nothing more than a rf signal that works on what's called "capture effect" in other words loudest signal wins. Blast a kilowatt of rf at the drone to put it in autopilot... and then add the gps data stream rf to it with the proper heights etc added and bingo now the drone has been jammed and the gps receiver is spoofed to Iran. Stupidly simple.  
Did the US really think that no-one could figure this out? Wouldn't a standard mode of analysis of a million dollar piece of apparatus be to figure out HOW to break it so it doesn't really happen? 
 
I live in a different world I guess that's what I'd do before I lost it. But we're talking the govt here   |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 02:21 PM | #27 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: May 2008 Location: Mansfield, MA 
					Posts: 5,238
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman  Not the design that was poor...it was the security that was poor. Ain't that difficult to encrypt a signal |  You'd be surprised.  I'm close friends with someone that does work on robots used by the military and *reliable* encrypted data transmission is a large problem for them. |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 02:33 PM | #28 |  
	| Super Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Georgetown MA 
					Posts: 18,225
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&  isn't that part of the design? |  Not necessarily...the Drone had Encryption built in both in the control signal and the GPS signal...so if they didn't use it right then its a security issue....not a design issue.
 
For the control signal they just jammed the radio signal.....didn't fudge with encryption at all. Just found the frequency it was operating at and broadcast a bunch of garbage to it....which just forced it into autopilot
 
Its the GPS Signal that makes you scratch your head...they had to break the Encryption to change the coordinates. The US probably used a weak encryption algorithm to increase performance...and they got burned. 
 
They had an issue before with the video feeds in these where they shut off the encryption on them to increase performance...and got burned. my guess is they probably figured they could go with a lower level encryption on the GPS signal....underestimating what Iran was capable of cracking (bet they had a little help too i.e. China, Russia)....and got burned
 
Its like giving somebody a plug and they take the hooks off because it will cast better...is it the plug design that is at fault because the guy isn't catching any fish with it....
 
Somebody's head is going to roll over this one I bet.....I think this is Human Error/Bad Judgement that caused this to happen
				 Last edited by The Dad Fisherman; 12-16-2011 at 02:47 PM..
 |  
| 
 
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 02:43 PM | #29 |  
	| Super Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Georgetown MA 
					Posts: 18,225
				 | 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by JohnnyD  You'd be surprised.  I'm close friends with someone that does work on robots used by the military and *reliable* encrypted data transmission is a large problem for them. |  My guess is that is probably because of the quality of the signal, not the encrytion of the data. |  
| 
 
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  12-16-2011, 02:58 PM | #30 |  
	| Permanently Disconnected 
				 
				Join Date: Nov 2002 
					Posts: 12,647
				 | yep and you need higher level rf signal with encryption because of it's characteristic of losing range. |  
|  |  
	|   |  |  
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:52 PM. |  |  |