Quote:
Originally Posted by iamskippy
Untill you force rec guys to report catches the logic is sound.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I understand what you are getting at, but from a perspective that looks at actual numbers of fish killed, it is in reality not a 50% rec reduction. The goal of the regulation is not a 50% reduction in rec harvest. The actuality is the critical part from a perspective of re-restoring
the stocks. When you say it is "actually a 50% reduction in the rec fish taken" that is factually not true, logic and opinions aside. Example, if no rec ever kept 2 fish, changing the regulations from 2 fish per day to 1 fish per day would have zero effect, not 50%. What needs to be done is real and actual reductions in the number of bass killed.
Threaded Mode