TWO BASS FOR RI CHARTER AND PARTY BOATS?

[Nebe]

Tell me. Who sits on these panels anyway? Charter captains??
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Nebe

Tell me. Who sits on these panels anyway? Charter captains??
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fox guarding the hen house.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by Nebe

Tell me. Who sits on these panels anyway? Charter captains??
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm sure there are some . They are pretty proactive guys . FYI We are all on the same team.
Everybody's trying to reach the 25% reduction . I think that's a good thing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[striperswiper75]

Originally Posted by buckman

I'm sure there are some . They are pretty proactive guys . FYI We are all on the same team.
Everybody's trying to reach the 25% reduction . I think that's a good thing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If we are all on the same team we should have the same recreational reduction across the board. Charters (recreational) should not have separate guidelines than (non charter) recreational. If we are all on the same team we should follow the will of the people who overwhelmingly supported a recreational reduction based on 1 fish a day.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[ivanputski]

Originally Posted by buckman

FYI We are all on the same team.
Everybody's trying to reach the 25% reduction . I think that's a good thing
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Why do i get the feeling that you think the reduction is a good thing strictly contingent upon being allowed 2 fish per day?
Your continued opposition to 1 fish, and strong support of being allowed to continue killing 2 per day does not put you and me on the same side...
I'm on the side of killing less so there are more fish alive in the ocean... You seem to be on the side of killing more so there's no interruption of money in your pocket. You just cant have it both ways.
The asmfc made that clever little conservational equivalency "menu" yet they forgot the fine print that says " selecting certain options leads to less fish in the ocean"
All those options were created so the asmfc can pass the final decision off to the states in a crappy attempt to make everyone happy without looking like the bad guy... All while sitting pretty under their window-dressing vote of " look! We passed 1@28" and we did our job".
Buuuuulllll shhhhhhhhh you did!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Ed B]

We need to find out the results of the meeting. Facts first.