Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
You could tell me, since I asked a few times, why Obama feels that Muslim truck drivers have a constitutional right to expect religious accommodations at work, but not these Christians? Is that not a valid question, given the facts? Isn't the same exact principle at play here?
|
this is an easy one Jim....different strokes for different folks...the left makes it up as they go along based on political expedience...like Obama's gay marriage evolution
In August 2008 at Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church in California “I believe marriage is the union between a man and a woman,” said Obama. “Now for me as a Christian,” and here he paused to let the applause die down, “for me as a Christian, it’s also a sacred union.” At this juncture, he pointed skyward and added, “God’s in the mix.”
Who could possibly have doubted so sincere a profession of faith? Obama adviser David Axelrod certainly did. “Opposition to gay marriage was particularly strong in the black church,” Axelrod wrote of Obama in his memoir, Believer: My Forty Years in Politics, “and as he ran for higher office, he grudgingly accepted the counsel of more pragmatic folks like me, and modified his position to support civil unions rather than marriage, which he would term a ‘sacred union.’”
In those two words, “sacred union,” is the rub. Obama not only lied, but he also used “God” to sell the lie, a stunning bit of blasphemy in whatever faith Obama professes.
For Obama, lying about his faith was apparently no big deal. As he told Axelrod after stumbling through a question on same-sex marriage, “I’m just not very good at bulls––ing.”
One has to ask, if Obama was willing to bulls–- about his relationship with God, what was he not willing to bulls–- about?"
also Eben....I'm not finding much in the Federalist Papers, Declaration, Constitution, Bill of Rights or any of the founding documents referring to the Salem witch trials...lot's of other informative stuff in there however....
Threaded Mode