Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Bingo.
Additionally, the engineering or actuary job Jim wants to fast track to is evaporating. His is a 1993's mindset at best.
The innovation economy of the future doesn't reward narrowly minded thinkers, it requires a multi-perspective approach to everything that can synthesize dissimilar ideas, market them, manage them etc…
I'm an artist in a sales job working with engineers on operational strategy. It's exactly what the ancient Greeks wanted.
|
"the engineering or actuary job Jim wants to fast track to is evaporating."
Clearly you know better than I do what skills are required for entry-level actuarial jobs.
"doesn't reward narrowly minded thinkers"
I never said narrow-minded thinking is the goal. What I said is that liberal arts courses aren't the path to open-minded thinking you claim they are. Again, look at Yale. A professor says "you don't have the right not to be offended", and the kids went berserk. Academia is one of the most narrow-minded bastions of thought in the universe.
If the point of these schools is to promote diversity of ideas, please explain the reaction when Condaleeza Rice or Ann Coulter is invited to speak? I'm all ears.
When Dr Rice was invited to speak at Rutgers, the faculty protested. Now, you are going to ask me to believe that those same faculty members promote diversity of thought in their class? I can give you as many examples as you want. The Mizzou professor who asked for "muscle" to haul off a student whose viewpoint she didn't agree with? She's going to teach her kids to be open-minded?
Ann Coulter gets invited to UCONN, the students storm the stage to silence her.
There is a Himalayan mountain of evidence to show that there is zero diversity of thought, or tolerance for opposing views, taught to these poor kids.
Let me guess, your response is "apples and oranges"