|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
StriperTalk! All things Striper |
 |
02-24-2016, 11:17 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Warwick RI,02889
Posts: 11,794
|
R/R not
traps or nets on coxes .. but possible additional turbines >><,
Last edited by Clammer; 02-24-2016 at 11:18 AM..
Reason: spelling again
|
ENJOY WHAT YOU HAVE !!!
MIKE
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 11:37 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
|
Received a reply from RIDEM about a possible re-location of the Black Point Floating Fish Trap:
{Due to the cable placement the FFT at Black Point will not be in operation anymore. We're not sure exactly how things will play out, but can say that if there is an action to move that FFT or something like that, there will be a full public process as it is a regulatory matter.
Please don’t misinterpret that this is what is going to happen, I am just suggesting that it is a possibility. We're really not sure how things will end up at this point, we are still working through the logistics. Point is that we are very cognizant of public access and want to make sure that we will not impact access in any meaningful way, therefore we will make sure we get full public vetting with anything that is done.}
Stay tuned.
|
DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"
Bi + Ne = SB 2
If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 01:25 PM
|
#3
|
Red Eye Jedi
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Facing
Posts: 4,374
|
I don't like when public access is mentioned in these types of scenarios. Access wasn't compromised where the other trap is so I don't see why they even mentioned it.
Makes me nervous...
|
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 02:01 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bart
I don't like when public access is mentioned in these types of scenarios. Access wasn't compromised where the other trap is so I don't see why they even mentioned it.
Makes me nervous...
|
Rob,
The response from DEM about public access was likely prompted from my statement and initial questions which included:
{Area surfcasters are concerned about the potential of gear conflict in new areas. Just trying to find out if the rumors are true and if any potential new trap locations are in publicly accessible shoreline areas.}
I know years ago a trap lead was attached directly to First Rock near Monahan's. Maybe it still is - I don't fish that way much anymore. Not sure what kind of impact it had on fish movement but you could cast right next to it.
|
DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"
Bi + Ne = SB 2
If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 04:20 PM
|
#5
|
Red Eye Jedi
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: East Facing
Posts: 4,374
|
Thanks, Dennis.
That one at First Rock is still there and the rocks leading to it and around it are easily accessible to the public, that's why I was confused.
Thanks for clarifying.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 05:08 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Narragansett
Posts: 903
|
It wasn't that many years ago when someone wanted to set a FFT directly in front of the center wall of the Harbor of Refuge, which fortunately was deemed a navigational hazard. I have visions of places where a trap would simply be a surfcasters's nightmare.
|
|
|
|
02-24-2016, 05:06 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sturbridge MA
Posts: 3,127
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clammer
R/R not
traps or nets on coxes .. but possible additional turbines >><,
|
That makes more sense than loading up the area with gil nets.
Dennis, thanks for keeping us informed on these things.
|
Everything is better on the rocks.
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.
|
| |