|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
10-11-2016, 06:04 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: RockVegas
Posts: 3,228
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Ok, I don't think border security is a non issue. I do think the issue has been distorted via fear mongering.
|
How is it distorted? We have terrorists entering this country to do harm. We have illegals entering this country committing crimes. We have illegals entering this country draining us resources and costing the tax payers rediculous amounts of money.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
The future ain't what it used to be. --Yogi Berra
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 04:47 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,377
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBo
How is it distorted? We have terrorists entering this country to do harm. We have illegals entering this country committing crimes. We have illegals entering this country draining us resources and costing the tax payers rediculous amounts of money.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So far the majority of those things Americans are doing the same thing in far greater numbers then Illegals 2 wars are what is draining this country of resources
but again facts dont matter Border Patrol apprehensions, which the government sees as a barometer of illegal border-crossing attempts, have been dropping for the past decade and a half. The Border Patrol apprehended 337,117 people nationwide in fiscal year 2015. That's down nearly 30 percent from the previous year and nearly 80 percent below the peak in 2000. wasn't that George W. Bush time in office???
Deportations increased under President Obama,
you want to stop immigration Invest in central America if they have astable Government and economy the will stay
|
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 06:15 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: RockVegas
Posts: 3,228
|
Surely you don't believe border security ends at the Mexican border. That's just one piece of the puzzle. We have a huge problem with people entering this country both legally and illegally. I don't want to stop immigration. We just need much tighter controls to follow the people that have already entered the US. Once here, they disappear into the woodwork, use different identities and addresses and apply for every government assistance program they can get on. All while working under the table or even legit jobs under their real name. There are no checks and balances.
I know first hand how it all works. My wife lost family over issues related to all this stuff because rightfully so, she doesn't agree with it either.
|
The future ain't what it used to be. --Yogi Berra
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 08:30 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
So far the majority of those things Americans are doing the same thing in far greater numbers then Illegals 2 wars are what is draining this country of resources
but again facts dont matter Border Patrol apprehensions, which the government sees as a barometer of illegal border-crossing attempts, have been dropping for the past decade and a half. The Border Patrol apprehended 337,117 people nationwide in fiscal year 2015. That's down nearly 30 percent from the previous year and nearly 80 percent below the peak in 2000. wasn't that George W. Bush time in office???
Deportations increased under President Obama,
you want to stop immigration Invest in central America if they have astable Government and economy the will stay
|
Is a speck of honesty too much to ask? Regarding Healthcare, Trump has also publicly said he wants to make it easier for insurance companies to write in multiple states, which might increase competition and lower prices. I don't know if that will help, but it is part of his platform, and you shouldn't pretend that it's not just to make him look less qualified.
|
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 03:36 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,377
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Is a speck of honesty too much to ask? Regarding Healthcare, Trump has also publicly said he wants to make it easier for insurance companies to write in multiple states, which might increase competition and lower prices. I don't know if that will help, but it is part of his platform, and you shouldn't pretend that it's not just to make him look less qualified.
|
Jim complain to the link and whats is in it.. he has no plan. what he is saying should have been done over the past 8 years instead of how many repeal attempts ...
in the US there are only 41 heath insurance company's and 11 Supplemental insurance company
Sadly there are not enough insurance company's to promote competition Trumps just playing to the uninformed who buy into the competition will lower prices ..
From the Party who supports 26 cable company's ... no Competition there
|
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 05:13 PM
|
#6
|
time to go
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim complain to the link and whats is in it.. he has no plan. what he is saying should have been done over the past 8 years instead of how many repeal attempts ...
in the US there are only 41 heath insurance company's and 11 Supplemental insurance company
Sadly there are not enough insurance company's to promote competition Trumps just playing to the uninformed who buy into the competition will lower prices ..
From the Party who supports 26 cable company's ... no Competition there
|
Speaking of the past 8 years, why didn't the Democrats pass Obama care during the first 2 years when they had complete control of the government. What kept them from turning this country into the utopia they want during the first 2 years of the Hussien Obama presidency.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 07:52 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim complain to the link and whats is in it.. he has no plan. what he is saying should have been done over the past 8 years instead of how many repeal attempts ...
|
A Presidential candidate doesn't have to have a fleshed out "plan." He may have an overall "vision" for the country described in vote catching phrases, but the vision would have to be made real by Congress which would also create the details. Or more accurately, the details would be written by some regulatory agency, which is constitutionally questionable. Or, the President could put on his dictator's hat and make various executive orders and have regulatory agencies make them happen. Which is even more constitutionally questionable. But who cares about constitutionality when we have gone so far beyond it that we think the President is supposed to have the responsibility for planning the direction and functioning of the country.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2016, 07:23 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim complain to the link and whats is in it.. he has no plan. what he is saying should have been done over the past 8 years instead of how many repeal attempts ...
in the US there are only 41 heath insurance company's and 11 Supplemental insurance company
Sadly there are not enough insurance company's to promote competition Trumps just playing to the uninformed who buy into the competition will lower prices ..
From the Party who supports 26 cable company's ... no Competition there
|
41 health insurance companies? Where did you get that number? That's funny, because at my company where I work , one of the insurance products we sell, is stop-loss insurance to health insurance companies. In other words, our customers, are health insurance companies. And even though we are a small player in that space, we have insurance policies with more than 50 health insurance companies.
Health insurance is expensive, but the profit margins in that business, are a bit below average, for profit margins for all markets - around 6% - 8%. So even if you made them profit-free, that doesn't save a ton.
Health insurance is expensive, because the thing being 'insured' (Healthcare) is very expensive. It's not because the health insurance companies are gouging. I have no idea how to make it cheaper, but we need to start by admitting the truth.
|
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 10:44 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Deportations increased under President Obama,
you want to stop immigration Invest in central America if they have astable Government and economy the will stay
|
"Deportations increased under President Obama,"
Which clearly implies that our borders aren't as secure as they need to be.
Do you lock your front door at night? Why?
"you want to stop immigration Invest in central America if they have astable Government and economy the will stay"
Oh Good Lord, now we have enough money to build a middle class in every country in our hemisphere?
Secure borders would also keep them in.
|
|
|
|
10-12-2016, 07:27 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
So far the majority of those things Americans are doing the same thing in far greater numbers then Illegals
How does this justify not deporting illegal aliens?
If we want to get into the weeds here, obviously the far greater number of a given set of people are likely to do things in far greater numbers than a far lesser number of another set of people. DUH. And is the percentage of illegals doing that same thing the same as the percentage of Americans doing it? And should we "drain more resources" just so we can accommodate illegals because they do less of the same thing. How about getting rid of as much of that illegal thing as we can rather than saying that it's OK to let illegals stay because they do less of the thing we want to get rid of . . . although at a higher rate population wise?
I just don't get what your statement has to do with deporting illegals.
2 wars are what is draining this country of resources
We have lots of resources, including oil, and lots of money not being used (remember quantitative easing?).
Not to fustercluck your mind about what the Federal Government is constitutionally allowed to spend money on, but war, national security, is one of its prime duties. It spends more on a lot of stuff that the Constitution does not give it permission to do. If it refrained from unconstitutional spending, our "resources" would not be drained.
but again facts dont matter Border Patrol apprehensions, which the government sees as a barometer of illegal border-crossing attempts, have been dropping for the past decade and a half. The Border Patrol apprehended 337,117 people nationwide in fiscal year 2015. That's down nearly 30 percent from the previous year and nearly 80 percent below the peak in 2000. wasn't that George W. Bush time in office???
No. George Bush did not officially become President until 2001. 2000 was Clinton's final year.
Deportations increased under President Obama,
Not really. Just depends on how you define deportation: http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-...402-story.html
you want to stop immigration Invest in central America if they have astable Government and economy the will stay
|
Would that be a way of draining lots of resources? Haven't we drained resources that way in lots of third world countries only to see those resources pocketed by the corrupt leaders of those countries? I suppose we could send more of our factories and jobs to central America. That would bypass the corrupt leaders, slow down immigration, and really be a boost to American citizens by creating a stable economy there instead of here. Good point.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.
|
| |