Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating


Left Nav S-B Home Register FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Right Nav

Left Container Right Container

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-03-2017, 11:23 AM   #1
Jim in CT
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,018
Supreme Court nominee Gorsuch

This is going to be fascinating political theater this week.

Both parties have been involved in partisan bickering over appointments to the court, which is vitally important and very significant.

Lots of hypocrisy on both sides. The Democrats invented the idea of voting against qualified judges for political reasons (Biden led the charge against Justice Bork). Now they are doing it again.

Harry Reid was the one who changed the Senate rules, decreeing that instead of the customary 60 vote requirement, that only 51 votes were needed. Reid was warned this could one day be used against Democrats, but he didn't care. Well, what's good for the goose.

Finally, Gorsuch is obviously qualified. The Democrats claim to not like that he doesn't rule "for the little guy". Again, these people need to take high school civics. Judges are not advocates for the underdog. Judges are supposed to abide by the law, regardless of which side might be more sympathetic. Why do these liberals think that every courthouse has a statue of Lady Justice who is blindfolded. What do they think the purpose of the blindfold is?

The GOP didn't prevent the maniac Sonya Sotomayor (who said female Latinas make better judges than white men) from getting confirmed. Well, as Obama likes to say (at least he used to like to say it), "elections have consequences".

If the Democrats want to (yet again) filibuster a nomination purely for political reasons, then McConnell damn well better follow the lead of Harry Reid and use the "nuclear option". The Dems have zero right to complain here. Zip.

The GOP did block Obama's nominee to replace Scalia. But again, it was Senators Biden and Schumer who previously said very explicitly, that Presidents at the end of their administrations, should not be allowed to make appointments to the Supreme Court.

No limits to their hypocrisy. None.

I really hope McConnell shows the fortitude to do what Reid did a few years ago. I think he will.

And if the Dems don't want to play ball here (where Trump is replacing one conservative with another, it results in no change to the makeup of the court), they won't like what Trump does if he gets the chance to replace Ginsburg. She really should have resigned when Obama could have replaced her with someone similarly liberal (like Fidel Castro, perhaps). If she steps down on Trump's watch, that's yuuuge.
Jim in CT is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin. Copyright 2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012