Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
And I want people in the mold of Scalia, deciding what limits are OK, and what is going too far.
|
Scalia isn't the greatest RKBA / 2ndA authority. Heller should have been 3 pages long, simply relying on SCOTUS precedent and sparing us the useless and dangerous textual analysis. You keep harping on the fact that the RKBA isn't absolute but you forget that, as Scalia did say correctly, "
the enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices off the table".
Just because we agree the right isn't absolute does not mean that I must agree that all gun control propositions are "on the table".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
All I'm talking about, are the tools that make mass murder easier. It's sad to me that we (as a nation) can't come close to an agreement on that.
|
And we never will when gun control supporters refuse to consider
what can legally be done when making their demands of what they
want to be done.
Why should gun rights people even acknowledge such foolishness, let alone engage in a "conversation" about ideas that are baldly unconstitutional?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
We need to prevent them from having such easy access to that firepower, to begin with. That's one of the points of this.
|
And as we have seen, there were laws and regulations in force that would have frustrated his legal acquisition of guns but the people entrusted and charged with making the laws work didn't do their jobs . . . And your answer is to give these incompetent jackasses more power?
Threaded Mode