What does it take to be an effective president

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Context


or Intent


or Protest


or....or....or.....C'mon, there's gotta be some reason why this is OK.

"I'm going to take a little liberty with some Hyperbole.

But say you witnessed a 100,000 people frothing at the mouth at his rallies, that number would only represent .03% of the population. (325,700,000)

That same number would only be .16% of the people who voted for him (62,980,160)

But yet, people have no problem posting up videos of a few of people on YouTube being ignorant A-holes and saying this is Trumps America.

Its Shameful and Irresponsible."
From another thread Posted by, guess who?

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

"I'm going to take a little liberty with some Hyperbole.

But say you witnessed a 100,000 people frothing at the mouth at his rallies, that number would only represent .03% of the population. (325,700,000)

That same number would only be .16% of the people who voted for him (62,980,160)

But yet, people have no problem posting up videos of a few of people on YouTube being ignorant A-holes and saying this is Trumps America.

Its Shameful and Irresponsible."
From another thread Posted by, guess who?

Point???

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Point???

If a few outliers don’t define Trumps group why does it not work the same for Democrats
Are they somehow more homogeneous than other groups
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

If a few outliers don’t define Trumps group why does it not work the same for Democrats
Are they somehow more homogeneous than other groups
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Touche'

I'll give ya that one.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Touche'

I'll give ya that one.

Nice move. You got Pete to admit that a few outliers don't define Trump's group. But I don't think you could convince Spence and wdmso that the few are outliers or that they are merely few. Actually, I don't think Pete thinks they are either. He kinda posed a trick question.

[spence]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Nice move. You got Pete to admit that a few outliers don't define Trump's group. But I don't think you could convince Spence and wdmso that the few are outliers or that they are merely few. Actually, I don't think Pete thinks they are either. He kinda posed a trick question.

How about Trump defining his own group?

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

How about Trump defining his own group?

That can be taken in at least two ways. I think the way you mean is Trump being the definition. Another way being Trump saying what the definition is. You and he, obviously would disagree in either instance. It would be a matter of opinion. You cite a lot of biased opinions and misinterpreted (intentionally or not) quotes and selected actions selectively interpreted by you and others. A whole lot of people disagree with you and your citations. Again, matters of opinion.