Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-10-2018, 09:52 AM   #1
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso View Post
back it the day you dropped your pants ..if your pencil was sharpened you were taken away ... Now the POTUS is going down this road with no Idea of History .. maybe he thinks he can force anyone of Native America heritage wear a feather as proof
Yeah, because this is the same exact thing. The woman lied, and she got rich off the lie. She checked off Native American on her application at Harvard, and they hired her at $400k a year.

And you can only fault the person calling her out for her lies? She isn't culpable at all? She didn't do anything wrong in your eyes?
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:17 AM   #2
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
Yeah, because this is the same exact thing. The woman lied, and she got rich off the lie. She checked off Native American on her application at Harvard, and they hired her at $400k a year.

And you can only fault the person calling her out for her lies? She isn't culpable at all? She didn't do anything wrong in your eyes?
Jim, there's no evidence her heritage had any impact on her employment at Harvard.
spence is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:47 AM   #3
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
Jim, there's no evidence her heritage had any impact on her employment at Harvard.
So why do you suppose, she checked that box? Are you that obtuse?

Harvard, in some kind of professor profile, made mention of it.
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 10:56 AM   #4
Pete F.
Canceled
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
So why do you suppose, she checked that box? Are you that obtuse?

Harvard, in some kind of professor profile, made mention of it.
You’re repeating false statements and think I should be willing to agree otherwise I’m wrong

Yelling louder doesn’t make you the winner
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!

Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?

Lets Go Darwin
Pete F. is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:04 AM   #5
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
If you don't agree with Kavanaugh's nomination at the very least pick another name off the list of 25 that you would support and say why.

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:52 AM   #6
RIROCKHOUND
Also known as OAK
iTrader: (0)
 
RIROCKHOUND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZ View Post
If you don't agree with Kavanaugh's nomination at the very least pick another name off the list of 25 that you would support and say why.
That is pretty hard for anyone less than far right of center. All 25 were vetted first by both the Federalist Society and the Heritage foundation...

Bryan

Originally Posted by #^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
RIROCKHOUND is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 12:15 PM   #7
DZ
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
DZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,574
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND View Post
That is pretty hard for anyone less than far right of center. All 25 were vetted first by both the Federalist Society and the Heritage foundation...
I understand. But the nomination of conservative SC justices is something that comes with winning the past election. If you win you get to call the shots and try and get your picks in. I remember a past president said something to the effect of "Elections have consequences". Kind of like that. Some people can go crazy but at the end of the day he may get his pick into the SC.

DZ
Recreational Surfcaster
"Limit Your Kill - Don't Kill Your Limit"

Bi + Ne = SB 2

If you haven't heard of the Snowstorm Blitz of 1987 - you someday will.
DZ is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 12:38 PM   #8
scottw
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
scottw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND View Post
That is pretty hard for anyone less than far right of center. .
where exactly is the center...?
scottw is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:08 AM   #9
spence
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
spence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
So why do you suppose, she checked that box? Are you that obtuse?

Harvard, in some kind of professor profile, made mention of it.
My understanding is she checked the box AFTER she was hired filling out some paperwork they use to document minority employees. The person who hired her has publicly stated they had no knowledge of any minority status and it wasn't a factor.

I think she genuinely believes she has some ancestry. This is just a political hit job to smear a woman with a pretty impressive resume.
spence is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 12:54 PM   #10
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
My understanding is she checked the box AFTER she was hired filling out some paperwork they use to document minority employees. The person who hired her has publicly stated they had no knowledge of any minority status and it wasn't a factor.

I think she genuinely believes she has some ancestry. This is just a political hit job to smear a woman with a pretty impressive resume.
Kavanaugh's resume is also impressive. His political hit job will be worse.
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 12:58 PM   #11
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence View Post
I think she genuinely believes she has some ancestry. .
'So you don't think she's a liar, you think she's delusional. Got it.
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 07-10-2018, 11:38 AM   #12
wdmso
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
Yeah, because this is the same exact thing. The woman lied, and she got rich off the lie. She checked off Native American on her application at Harvard, and they hired her at $400k a year.

And you can only fault the person calling her out for her lies? She isn't culpable at all? She didn't do anything wrong in your eyes?
this is the same guy who offered $5 million donation if President Obama released “his college records and applications” and his “passport applications and records.”


did she do the work ? or are you saying they just paid her 400k for being an Indian
wdmso is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com