|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-06-2019, 10:55 AM
|
#1
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Many prominent democrats are calling on the VA governor to resign. I haven't seen a single prominent democrat call on the Lieutenant Governor to resign, and if an unsubstantiated allegation was enough to disqualify Kavanaugh, why isn't it enough to disqualify this guy?
The speech was decent, and as you said, after his calls for unity, we'll go back to gridlock. Although he did offer to extend protection for DACA folks in exchange for the wall, he did offer something.
|
Much of the calls, not from the lunatic fringe was for an investigation and hearings on the Kavanaugh situation. I felt the Garland situation was the main reason to disqualify Kavanaugh, but that is me. I 100% support an investigation into this if warranted in to the LT Gov. I would suspect most reasonable people feel the same.
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-06-2019, 11:11 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Much of the calls, not from the lunatic fringe was for an investigation and hearings on the Kavanaugh situation. I felt the Garland situation was the main reason to disqualify Kavanaugh, but that is me. I 100% support an investigation into this if warranted in to the LT Gov. I would suspect most reasonable people feel the same.
|
The vast majority of democrats in the senate voted against Kavanaugh, If a mere allegation is enough to disqualify him, why isn't it enough to disqualify the Lt Governor of VA?
As for Garland, he should have had a hearing and then been rejected. The American people have seen fit to give the Senate to the GOP, and they didn't do so, so that Obama could shift the court a mile to the left. As Obama used to like to say, at least when it suited him, elections have consequences.
I think most mainstream democrats were saying the allegation was enough to keep Kavanaugh off the court. But today's "mainstream" democrat was considered a whacko a few years ago. TDS is driving that party a million miles to the left of Nancy Pelosi. It's the stupidest thing they could do, but it's what they're doing.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2019, 11:22 AM
|
#3
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
The vast majority of democrats in the senate voted against Kavanaugh, If a mere allegation is enough to disqualify him, why isn't it enough to disqualify the Lt Governor of VA?
.
|
Which happened after the hearings and investigation, right?
Have an investigation into the Lt Gov, 100% for it here, but I am not a voter in VA so that plus $2 will get a cup of coffee...
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-06-2019, 11:29 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Which happened after the hearings and investigation, right?
Have an investigation into the Lt Gov, 100% for it here, but I am not a voter in VA so that plus $2 will get a cup of coffee...
|
Yes. After an investigation (which produced allegations which had zero substantiation and a million holes), all the democrats except 2(?) still voted against him. So my point holds. The mere allegation was enough for the democrats to conclude he was ineligible.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2019, 11:35 AM
|
#5
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Yes. After an investigation (which produced allegations which had zero substantiation and a million holes), all the democrats except 2(?) still voted against him. So my point holds. The mere allegation was enough for the democrats to conclude he was ineligible.
|
Great. Have the accuser on the record and testify/investigate. That was the standard the GOP set for Kavanaugh.
Otherwise, this is a vague hit piece in a third rate 'news' outlet on the Lt. Gov with no follow up yet.
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
02-06-2019, 11:38 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Great. Have the accuser on the record and testify/investigate. That was the standard the GOP set for Kavanaugh.
Otherwise, this is a vague hit piece in a third rate 'news' outlet on the Lt. Gov with no follow up yet.
|
OK, is anyone on the left calling for an investigation of the Lt Governor? The shape that state is in, the dog catcher may be the last one left who can serve as governor. Everyone else in the line ahead, has serious issues.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2019, 11:24 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,377
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Much of the calls, not from the lunatic fringe was for an investigation and hearings on the Kavanaugh situation. I felt the Garland situation was the main reason to disqualify Kavanaugh, but that is me. I 100% support an investigation into this if warranted in to the LT Gov. I would suspect most reasonable people feel the same.
|
Absolutely the Kavanaugh push back was 99% about Garland no matter how the right insist it was not.
As far as the lt gov goes I haven’t seen anything from this accusers about it? Yet
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-06-2019, 11:32 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Absolutely the Kavanaugh push back was 99% about Garland no matter how the right insist it was not.
As far as the lt gov goes I haven’t seen anything from this accusers about it? Yet
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
That's not what the left said. The left said it was because he was an abuser of women, which the left started caring about as soon as Bill Clinton stopped being useful.
"I haven’t seen anything from this accusers about it? Yet"
Then you aren't looking. And you won't hear about it on MCNBC or CNN.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 AM.
|
| |