|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
04-08-2019, 12:09 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
first step act
Happy to see the president give prison reform some attention. This has been talked about for years with no results to speak of. Great idea here from the racist.
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
04-08-2019, 01:53 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
Happy to see the president give prison reform some attention. This has been talked about for years with no results to speak of. Great idea here from the racist.
|
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) urged fellow Republicans to pass legislation during the lame duck session of the 115th United States Congress, by tweet, "GOP colleagues: NOW is time to pass crim justice reform unless your argument is that you prefer to work w Speaker Nancy Pelosi to pass a bill?
The act was signed by President Donald Trump (not his Idea) but positive nonetheless
once again something that should have been done because it needed to be done ... was ushered in in lame duck session for partisans reasons
|
|
|
|
04-08-2019, 02:22 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,591
|
Maybe he’s fluffing up his new nest?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
04-08-2019, 05:51 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) urged fellow Republicans to pass legislation during the lame duck session of the 115th United States Congress, by tweet, "GOP colleagues: NOW is time to pass crim justice reform unless your argument is that you prefer to work w Speaker Nancy Pelosi to pass a bill?
The act was signed by President Donald Trump (not his Idea) but positive nonetheless
once again something that should have been done because it needed to be done ... was ushered in in lame duck session for partisans reasons
|
Is that because it would have been opposed for partisan reason? Again,you like the results but oppose how it happened. What does that tell you?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 07:37 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
Is that because it would have been opposed for partisan reason? Again,you like the results but oppose how it happened. What does that tell you?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
it tells me the true reason was for a win 1st not the actual bill itself afraid they were going to lose the Senate which they didn't
At most dems would have expanded it not killed it ,,and for them that would be worse
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 08:30 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Despite your whatabout it seems you are pleased with the outcome. But never without throwing a shot at the other party despite approving. If the Dems liked it so much I am sure you are surprised they never accomplished such.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 08:57 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
Is that because it would have been opposed for partisan reason? Again,you like the results but oppose how it happened. What does that tell you?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
it tells us everything. everything.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 08:59 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
it tells me the true reason was for a win 1st not the actual bill itself afraid they were going to lose the Senate which they didn't
At most dems would have expanded it not killed it ,,and for them that would be worse
|
how come obama didn’t do it in his first two years, when the dems controlled everything?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 12:17 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
how come obama didn’t do it in his first two years, when the dems controlled everything?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Health care before prison reform reasonable priority .. or once again you see them as equally important .. then who took over both houses
Back at you.. why with both houses why pass prison reform over comprehensive immigration reform?
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 12:23 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Health care before prison reform reasonable priority .. or once again you see them as equally important .. then who took over both houses
Back at you.. why with both houses why pass prison reform over comprehensive immigration reform?
|
I have said many many times, that Trump deserves serious criticism for not building the wall when he could have. I can criticize Trump.
I didn't know Obama couldn't do 2 things at once.
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 01:59 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
I have said many many times, that Trump deserves serious criticism for not building the wall when he could have. I can criticize Trump.
I didn't know Obama couldn't do 2 things at once.
|
it's called national priorities clearly prison reform wasn't on his list
building the wall is not what i would call comprehensive immigration reform?
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 02:22 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,435
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
it's called national priorities clearly prison reform wasn't on his list
building the wall is not what i would call comprehensive immigration reform?
|
i know what prioritizatiim means. I also know what TDS stands for.
You like the prison reform, if Hilary did it you’d be weeping with joy. you can’t give him credit for doing something to help the country. You can’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
04-09-2019, 03:22 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,231
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
You like the prison reform, if Hilary did it you’d be weeping with joy. you can’t give him credit for doing something to help the country. You can’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
What this thread is missing is all the criminal justice reform Obama signed his second term that Trump undid. Far outweighs the bi partisan legislation. One step forward two steps back.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
04-10-2019, 07:10 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
i know what prioritizatiim means. I also know what TDS stands for.
You like the prison reform, if Hilary did it you’d be weeping with joy. you can’t give him credit for doing something to help the country. You can’t.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I clearly said it was positive that he signed it .. my issue is the reasons he signed it ... for a win
seems you still suffer from HDS. You do know she lost
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
04-10-2019, 07:51 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
I clearly said it was positive that he signed it .. my issue is the reasons he signed it ... for a win
seems you still suffer from HDS. You do know she lost
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Wayne, you are more similar to Trump than you might want to admit. Everything is party driven in your world and you either want credit or to place blame based on affiliation. More concerned with motives than results. Two peas in a pod I guess.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
04-10-2019, 11:35 AM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,197
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
Wayne, you are more similar to Trump than you might want to admit. Everything is party driven in your world and you either want credit or to place blame based on affiliation. More concerned with motives than results. Two peas in a pod I guess.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Again I see the reasons why Trump signed it are not debatable because he signed it ...
kinda like kraft and his behavior is excusable to some because he gave lots of money to charities that help the women like those who serviced him...
|
|
|
|
04-10-2019, 12:22 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
The word superfluous comes to mind. As far as Kraft, I think a lot of people simply don’t care or may want to pick their battles instead of being in every fight.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Last edited by Sea Dangles; 04-10-2019 at 12:33 PM..
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 PM.
|
| |