Muller report AG new conference

[Got Stripers]

So you saw nothing in the mueller report suggesting obstruction? You need to get some reading glasses, CVS or job lot have them pretty cheap. I find it ironic that you constantly hold up the founding fathers intent and distain for government over reach, yet you are ok with clear over reach and obstruction by the executive branch of our government. No need to respond, I’m pretty sure I have your number and can predict your response. The new norm for our government should concern us all.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

So you saw nothing in the mueller report suggesting obstruction? You need to get some reading glasses, CVS or job lot have them pretty cheap. I find it ironic that you constantly hold up the founding fathers intent and distain for government over reach, yet you are ok with clear over reach and obstruction by the executive branch of our government. No need to respond, I’m pretty sure I have your number and can predict your response. The new norm for our government should concern us all.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

^^^ this
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

^^^ this
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Mueller chose not to indict. I heard for two years, that Mueller was the final word. That is exculpatory.

Can we at least conclude that you are no longer shrieking about collusion, that you have at least moved on to obstruction?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

So you saw nothing in the mueller report suggesting obstruction?

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

how can you obstruct an investigation into collusion that never existed?

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

how can you obstruct an investigation into collusion that never existed?

Maybe you could think about this one for a bit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Maybe you could think about this one for a bit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

right he was obstructing injustice

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

So you saw nothing in the mueller report suggesting obstruction? You need to get some reading glasses, CVS or job lot have them pretty cheap. I find it ironic that you constantly hold up the founding fathers intent and distain for government over reach, yet you are ok with clear over reach and obstruction by the executive branch of our government. No need to respond, I’m pretty sure I have your number and can predict your response. The new norm for our government should concern us all.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Plenty of evidence that Trump was being a vindictive baby as always. Mueller chose not to indict, which is exculpatory. If it was "clear obstruction", why didn't Mueller choose to indict?

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Plenty of evidence that Trump was being a vindictive baby as always. Mueller chose not to indict, which is exculpatory. If it was "clear obstruction", why didn't Mueller choose to indict?

Policy and tradition you can’t indite a sitting president, I guess you have not been paying attention.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

So you saw nothing in the mueller report suggesting obstruction? You need to get some reading glasses, CVS or job lot have them pretty cheap. I find it ironic that you constantly hold up the founding fathers intent and distain for government over reach, yet you are ok with clear over reach and obstruction by the executive branch of our government. No need to respond, I’m pretty sure I have your number and can predict your response. The new norm for our government should concern us all.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Suggesting obstruction is not conclusive obstruction. There was not sufficient evidence to conclude obstruction.