Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
The premise for your question is faulty
Mueller clearly states his reasons in the report
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You keep repeating the talking point but avoid answering my questions.
You said that the premise for Mueller not concluding whether to bring charges of obstruction or not was because of the OLC. By that reasoning, he could also not have recommended bringing charges against Trump for conspiracy. If that were the case, what was the point of his investigation? Are you saying that he would only be allowed by the OLC to conclude that their was not sufficient evidence to make a charge, but would not be allowed to conclude that there was sufficient evidence to do so? And that his purpose was not to make a prosecutorial investigation, but to gather evidence for Congress?
Threaded Mode