Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
What about?
Good fallback
Have no fear, he just said he’s an extremely stable genius.
I’m sure you were aware of that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
so you can post Trump is an
idiot and incapable of sophisticated thought, and thats OK.
But when i respond with accurate examples of things he’s done that indicate the ability to solve an extremely complicated problem, then i am guilty of “whataboutism”.
in other words, i’m not allowed
to respond.
He won a presidential election against the most inevitable
candidate since Reagan’s second term, and he won in a rout, and he did it with the entire
media aligned against him.
He did something that no one said he could do, something on the national
stage. he solved a very complicated problem. it’s a very sophisticated achievement. thats what happened, whether you like it or not.
i’m not relying on the idiotic things he says, i’m basing my conclusions on what he does.
Lowest unemployment in 50 years? if that’s not a sign of being able to tackle sophisticated problems, how come no previous presidents pulled it off? sorry, is that more whataboutism?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Threaded Mode