Trump’s losing it

[PaulS]

What did Hillary do that was unethical?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

What did Hillary do that was unethical?

i don’t even know! but your side
keeps saying that revealing the emails, helped cost her the election. so i presume
something was in there, right? if the leaked emails were about yoga and chelsea’s wedding, no one would be saying it impacted the election.

pete claimed that russia’s leaking the emails, tilted the election in favor of trump. that necessarily means, that what was in the emails, hurt hilary. right?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i don’t even know! but your side
keeps saying that revealing the emails, helped cost her the election. so i presume
something was in there, right? if the leaked emails were about yoga and chelsea’s wedding, no one would be saying it impacted the election.

pete claimed that russia’s leaking the emails, tilted the election in favor of trump. that necessarily means, that what was in the emails, hurt hilary. right?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I asked a serious question. You said "so when hilary gets caught being unethical, you ignore what she did and focus on how the story broke. do i have that right?" So I asked bc I wanted to find out what she did.

Unlike you I don't have "a side" and have prob. still voted for more Presidential candidates with Republican after their name than I have for Democrats.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I asked a serious question. You said "so when hilary gets caught being unethical, you ignore what she did and focus on how the story broke. do i have that right?" So I asked bc I wanted to find out what she did.

Unlike you I don't have "a side" and have prob. still voted for more Presidential candidates with Republican after their name than I have for Democrats.

you did ask a serious question. i don’t know the answer, and admitted that. i never claimed
i had knowledge of what was in the emails.

So pete says that the leaking of the emails hurt her chances of getting elected. From that, i assume
that means there was something bad in the emails.

you disagree?

so Pete says that public knowledge of the emails harmed
her chances of winning, and you don’t concede that means the emails made her look bad?

this is great...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Unlike you I don't have "a side" and have prob. still voted for more Presidential candidates with Republican after their name than I have for Democrats.

right, right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

What did Hillary do that was unethical?

How about screwing over Bernie to start. Or is that acceptable behavior?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

How about screwing over Bernie to start. Or is that acceptable behavior?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

plus getting debate questions ahead of time, some speeches to wall street that were problematic for her, easy to look up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

plus getting debate questions ahead of time, some speeches to wall street that were problematic for her, easy to look up.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What was the question she got? I believe it was 1 question.

And why were the speeches problematic? Is it bc she refuses to release them and you don't know what she talked about?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

What was the question she got? I believe it was 1 question.

And why were the speeches problematic? Is it bc she refuses to release them and you don't know what she talked about?

bernie wanted speeches released, she resisted.

paul, did your side make a big deal about how the email
release hurt Hilary, or not? can we start there?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

bernie wanted speeches released, she resisted.

paul, did your side make a big deal about how the email
release hurt Hilary, or not? can we start there?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

But you have posted numerous times almost the same thing about the speeches that you said above and that you wanted them released. So what was the big scandal with her not releasing speeches that she was paid for by private entities that hired her?

Would you release the completion factors that your employer paid you to develop?


And what was the question that turned the tide for Hillary? Did Trump receive any questions ahead of time?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

But you have posted numerous times almost the same thing about the speeches that you said above and that you wanted them released. So what was the big scandal with her not releasing speeches that she was paid for by private entities that hired her?

Would you release the completion factors that your employer paid you to develop?


And what was the question that turned the tide for Hillary? Did Trump receive any questions ahead of time?

can you answer my question possibly? did your side make a big deal that releasing these emails
hurt hilary, yes or no?

if i was applying for a chief actuary job, and my employer wanted to see transcripts of speeches i gave, unless there was proprietary intellectual property in there, i’d feel
like i had to divulge it. that’s actually a great question. So was
mine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

How about screwing over Bernie to start. Or is that acceptable behavior?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

How did Hillary screw over Bernie?

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

How did Hillary screw over Bernie?

She accepted help in rigging the election against Bernie. That is only if you believe Bernie. Also,only if you consider getting answers to questions before they are asked to be unethical. Did you consider that fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

She accepted help in rigging the election against Bernie. That is only if you believe Bernie. Also,only if you consider getting answers to questions before they are asked to be unethical. Did you consider that fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

specifics please. So what was this question that threw the nomination to Hillary? I find it hard to believe that one question threw the nomination. And if Trump received similar help would that be unethical also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

specifics please. So what was this question that threw the nomination to Hillary? I find it hard to believe that one question threw the nomination. And if Trump received similar help would that be unethical also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Bernie believes this to be the case,google it. And no,if Trump received help it is perfectly fine.

Why not answer my question?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Bernie believes this to be the case,google it. And no,if Trump received help it is perfectly fine.

Why not answer my question?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Do you realize how hypocritical your statement is? Can you please provide a link where Bernie says Hillary being given one question ruined his chance to be the Democratic candidate. And your first statement was that Hillary accepted help not that Bernie said it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by PaulS

specifics please. So what was this question that threw the nomination to Hillary? I find it hard to believe that one question threw the nomination. And if Trump received similar help would that be unethical also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Complaining about the debate questions is trivial. Only thing the Clinton campaign did of substance was to arm twist the DNC on cash which was hardball but not illegal. Sanders wasn't going to get the nomination anyway. Clinton only lost because of her self inflicted email issues and Russian interference.

Right now I'm a lot more concerned about real corruption and dysfunction in this Administration that is an order of magnitude beyond what I've ever seen. As the impeachment subpoenas continue to come forth the circle of wagons is going to get really tight really fast. Did you see Miller, Jordan and McCarthy on Sunday? They are all clueless on how to respond other than spouting conspiracy theories. We have a lawless leader, it's time to fix that.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by spence

Complaining about the debate questions is trivial.

Of course it is. But that's what some of the people on the right have become here. It's not right to give her the question but the question they gave her was something any candidate would prepare for. Mountain out of a molehill.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by spence

Complaining about the debate questions is trivial. Only thing the Clinton campaign did of substance was to arm twist the DNC on cash which was hardball but not illegal. Sanders wasn't going to get the nomination anyway. Clinton only lost because of her self inflicted email issues and Russian interference.

Right now I'm a lot more concerned about real corruption and dysfunction in this Administration that is an order of magnitude beyond what I've ever seen. As the impeachment subpoenas continue to come forth the circle of wagons is going to get really tight really fast. Did you see Miller, Jordan and McCarthy on Sunday? They are all clueless on how to respond other than spouting conspiracy theories. We have a lawless leader, it's time to fix that.

Miller just looked bat#^&#^&#^&#^& crazy.... but don’t worry he has worked in government for 3 years and knows what a deep state operation looks like.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device