Trump’s losing it

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

How did Hillary screw over Bernie?

She accepted help in rigging the election against Bernie. That is only if you believe Bernie. Also,only if you consider getting answers to questions before they are asked to be unethical. Did you consider that fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

She accepted help in rigging the election against Bernie. That is only if you believe Bernie. Also,only if you consider getting answers to questions before they are asked to be unethical. Did you consider that fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

specifics please. So what was this question that threw the nomination to Hillary? I find it hard to believe that one question threw the nomination. And if Trump received similar help would that be unethical also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

specifics please. So what was this question that threw the nomination to Hillary? I find it hard to believe that one question threw the nomination. And if Trump received similar help would that be unethical also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Bernie believes this to be the case,google it. And no,if Trump received help it is perfectly fine.

Why not answer my question?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Bernie believes this to be the case,google it. And no,if Trump received help it is perfectly fine.

Why not answer my question?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Do you realize how hypocritical your statement is? Can you please provide a link where Bernie says Hillary being given one question ruined his chance to be the Democratic candidate. And your first statement was that Hillary accepted help not that Bernie said it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Do you realize how hypocritical your statement is? Can you please provide a link where Bernie says Hillary being given one question ruined his chance to be the Democratic candidate. And your first statement was that Hillary accepted help not that Bernie said it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes I do.

I never said anything about one question ruining his chances,you did. I said Sanders believes the nomination was rigged. That is why he did not endorse her. She accepted help and that is an uneven playing field.

I will ask again because you seem chatty. Do you believe that was fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Yes I do.

I never said anything about one question ruining his chances,you did. I said Sanders believes the nomination was rigged. That is why he did not endorse her. She accepted help and that is an uneven playing field.

I will ask again because you seem chatty. Do you believe that was fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

the use of superdelegates was a joke, a way to
ensure she got the
nomination even if bernie was winning states, he could fall
further behind in the delegate count.

democrats ain’t big on democracy, unless they get what they want. we see that again and again and again.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

Yes I do.

I never said anything about one question ruining his chances,you did. I said Sanders believes the nomination was rigged. That is why he did not endorse her. She accepted help and that is an uneven playing field.

I will ask again because you seem chatty. Do you believe that was fair play?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Firstly thank you for admitting your hypocrite. You might want to be Petty and point out the spelling in that sentence. I asked what did hillary do that was unethical because Jim made that statement. You said screwing over Bernie to start, not that Bernie said it. So I will ask again what exactly did Hillary do that was unethical bc I really don't know what you guys are talking about. Are you talking about receiving a question because that's not her being unethical that's Donna brazile being unethical.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by PaulS

specifics please. So what was this question that threw the nomination to Hillary? I find it hard to believe that one question threw the nomination. And if Trump received similar help would that be unethical also?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Complaining about the debate questions is trivial. Only thing the Clinton campaign did of substance was to arm twist the DNC on cash which was hardball but not illegal. Sanders wasn't going to get the nomination anyway. Clinton only lost because of her self inflicted email issues and Russian interference.

Right now I'm a lot more concerned about real corruption and dysfunction in this Administration that is an order of magnitude beyond what I've ever seen. As the impeachment subpoenas continue to come forth the circle of wagons is going to get really tight really fast. Did you see Miller, Jordan and McCarthy on Sunday? They are all clueless on how to respond other than spouting conspiracy theories. We have a lawless leader, it's time to fix that.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by spence

Complaining about the debate questions is trivial.

Of course it is. But that's what some of the people on the right have become here. It's not right to give her the question but the question they gave her was something any candidate would prepare for. Mountain out of a molehill.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Of course it is. But that's what some of the people on the right have become here. It's not right to give her the question but the question they gave her was something any candidate would prepare for. Mountain out of a molehill.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

paul, why does the left still
insist that the release of those emails hurt hilary in the election, if those emails revealed nothing of substance?

can’t have it both ways.

if the emails revealed nothing, then how did they hurt her?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

paul, why does the left still
insist that the release of those emails hurt hilary in the election, if those emails revealed nothing of substance?

can’t have it both ways.

if the emails revealed nothing, then how did they hurt her?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Again I never made one statement about the emails here. It's hilarious that you have no problem with Trump being helped by the Russians for some reason. Is it because of 3.7 and 28000 That anything Trump does is fine with you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by spence

Complaining about the debate questions is trivial. Only thing the Clinton campaign did of substance was to arm twist the DNC on cash which was hardball but not illegal. Sanders wasn't going to get the nomination anyway. Clinton only lost because of her self inflicted email issues and Russian interference.

Right now I'm a lot more concerned about real corruption and dysfunction in this Administration that is an order of magnitude beyond what I've ever seen. As the impeachment subpoenas continue to come forth the circle of wagons is going to get really tight really fast. Did you see Miller, Jordan and McCarthy on Sunday? They are all clueless on how to respond other than spouting conspiracy theories. We have a lawless leader, it's time to fix that.

Miller just looked bat#^&#^&#^&#^& crazy.... but don’t worry he has worked in government for 3 years and knows what a deep state operation looks like.....
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device