|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
10-18-2019, 07:47 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Apparently you’ll be happy when a dem wins and does whatever they want claiming Congress can’t investigate
Like Benghazi, Whitewater, IRS, etc
That’s the precedent
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Oh, so you're concerned about precedent. Interesting.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2019, 08:03 PM
|
#2
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Oh, so you're concerned about precedent. Interesting.
|
And you claim to be an originalist, or is it sometimes a living document?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
10-18-2019, 08:16 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
And you claim to be an originalist,
A mix of textualism and originalism.
or is it sometimes a living document?
|
No.
What do you claim?
|
|
|
|
10-18-2019, 08:19 PM
|
#4
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
No.
What do you claim?
|
I claim Trump is totally ignorant of it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
10-18-2019, 08:24 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
I claim Trump is totally ignorant of it
|
Interesting precedent you're setting. Verification by accusation.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2019, 09:35 PM
|
#6
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Interesting precedent you're setting. Verification by accusation.
|
A claim much like impeachment is not verification or adjudication that comes later in the case of impeachment in the Senate. Trump is also confused by that.
Trump insists “I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President.”
True or false?
“I have the absolute right to declare a national emergency”
True or false?
Just this week the president flatly rejected any notion of congressional oversight. No administration officials will come before Congress to answer questions and no documents will be provided. Preposterously, the letter his lawyer sent to Congress deemed impeachment proceedings—clearly vested in Congress by the Constitution—unconstitutional!
True or false?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
10-18-2019, 10:27 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
A claim much like impeachment is not verification or adjudication that comes later in the case of impeachment in the Senate. Trump is also confused by that.
Yeah, well most of your tedious posts are claims and opinions that you gather and pile on to justify or verify your opinion of who Trump really is, and how dangerous to the survival of this nation he is.
Trump insists “I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President.”
True or false?
That is Trump Speak. You have to emphasize the "as President" part. He has the Article II right to do whatever Article II allows him to do "as President".
“I have the absolute right to declare a national emergency”
True or false?
Are you questioning his use of the word "absolute"? You do realize that he tends to exaggerate? Do you even believe that anything can be absolute?
Just this week the president flatly rejected any notion of congressional oversight. No administration officials will come before Congress to answer questions and no documents will be provided. Preposterously, the letter his lawyer sent to Congress deemed impeachment proceedings—clearly vested in Congress by the Constitution—unconstitutional!
True or false?
|
Irrelevant. Congress can go about its business regardless of what his lawyer thinks. And it has powers and means to get documents. And if a document is protected by privilege or any other legal stipulation, then it will have to continue without it. That all is legally correct and justified.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 AM.
|
| |