What it wasn’t a witch hunt

[Got Stripers]

Fact is Barr and Durham met with the IG ahead of the release and they offered nothing to change the findings, siding with Barr doesn’t change anything. No deep state. No coup. Interference by foreign powers continues at Trumps request, through his personal attorney, but let’s focus on the past it’s so much more important than the security of the elections.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Fact is Barr and Durham met with the IG ahead of the release and they offered nothing to change the findings, siding with Barr doesn’t change anything. No deep state. No coup. Interference by foreign powers continues at Trumps request, through his personal attorney, but let’s focus on the past it’s so much more important than the security of the elections.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fact is there was no need to change the facts of the investigation. The only disagreement that Barr and Durham offered was in the notion that there was no evidence of political bias. Barr explained that Horowitz did not have the legal authority to sufficiently explore that issue. Horowitz could only ask questions and accept the answers. He did not have the power to subpoena nor to compel nor to go beyond those working in the DOJ.

As far as the "facts" of the investigation goes, Barr and Durham accepted them, Horowitz's suggestion that there was no political bias is not a factual statement that there was none, but merely a statement that he did not find it. As Barr said, he did not have the tools available to determine it. But that Durham does have the ability to explore the whole issue of criminality well beyond what Horowitz had. And that the Durham investigation will be more thorough and probative of criminality.

And the fact is that Horowitz said that no one involved was exonerated.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Fact is there was no need to change the facts of the investigation. The only disagreement that Barr and Durham offered was in the notion that there was no evidence of political bias. Barr explained that Horowitz did not have the legal authority to sufficiently explore that issue. Horowitz could only ask questions and accept the answers. He did not have the power to subpoena nor to compel nor to go beyond those working in the DOJ.

As far as the "facts" of the investigation goes, Barr and Durham accepted them, Horowitz's suggestion that there was no political bias is not a factual statement that there was none, but merely a statement that he did not find it. As Barr said, he did not have the tools available to determine it. But that Durham does have the ability to explore the whole issue of criminality well beyond what Horowitz had. And that the Durham investigation will be more thorough and probative of criminality.

And the fact is that Horowitz said that no one involved was exonerated.

does anyone have any clue when Durham will release his report?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

does anyone have any clue when Durham will release his report?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Barr hinted that it might be early to mid next summer. But who knows.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Barr hinted that it might be early to mid next summer. But who knows.

thanks. long time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

thanks. long time.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

no rush....democraps are destroying themselves and turnng trump into a folk hero...it's immense fun to watch...looking forward to Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Strozk, Page...maybe even Obama....all going to jail....

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

does anyone have any clue when Durham will release his report?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

When it’s politically expedient
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device