Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
One of the steps is to dissent. Complain. Argue with logic and evidence. There have been many dissenting arguments with what was considered supporting evidence re the criminal pursuit of Stone. Even what he was convicted of was not a crime that existed before he was investigated, but were basically process crimes that occurred because of the investigation.
This sort of dissent happens a lot in investigations and trials and convictions or exonerations. It happes a lot on this forum by those on both "sides." It's not an interference, it is part of free speech, freedom of thought, freedom of dissent. It is a healthy sign that those freedoms still exist.
You complain about authoritarianism, yet you display an authoritarian attitude toward dissenters you don't agree with. You dismiss them as mindless conspiracy theorists, yet you mindlessly spout your own conspiracy theory that "the right lives in them daily".
|
So dismissing those who present baseless suggestion or aka conspiracies that are not based on logic or evidence ( still waiting on this evidence) is a authoritarian attitude .. ok. Sure it is.
And this Trump free speech argument is a weak argument for his interfering in Stone and now Flynn who pleaded guilty.
And Stone never committed a crime because you think a crime wasn't commented ?
And Just because there were no investigation by Ukraine trump never asked for a quid pro quo ...
I see your logic their is no justice for Republicans
Hybrid Mode
