Senators reach deal ...

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Nope just here ,,, I'd still fish with anyone here , politics stay at the dock

So what other sites are you referring to?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

So what other sites are you referring to?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I go read brightbart comments .. very entertaining to see what true trump believers think
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by wdmso

I go read brightbart comments .. very entertaining to see what true trump believers think
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

So you read Breitbart and then come on hear feigning surprise that other “sites” have folks supporting Trump.

Is this how retirement is gonna go? Why not try happiness...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

So you read Breitbart




actually...it's Bartbright

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

So you read Breitbart and then come on hear feigning surprise that other “sites” have folks supporting Trump.

Is this how retirement is gonna go? Why not try happiness...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Their jim jones type supporters on that site

You should take a look
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Their jim jones type supporters on that site

You should take a look
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

This is one of the reasons you remain ignorant. And by ignorant, I don't mean stupid. I mean the non-judgmental definition--uninformed or misinformed. You pick one supposedly or reputedly negative thing or name about something or someone and then judge the whole by it. What site, or news agency or TV network does not have at least one person or commentator or program that many think is bat$hit crazy? Are your relied on sources purely free of any such blights? So you dismiss what could be enlightening information by ignorantly casting a negative light on the entire source.

And your ignorance may not be entirely innocent. I suspect you disagree with the "world view," as you've put it in the past, or with the political view or slant, of Breitbart, or Fox New, or various bloggers, etc., so you intentionally pick something you think is negative about them, point that out, then think you've proved that they are to be scorned and dismissed.

Breitbart and Fox news are excellent sources for things that the left leaning media avoid covering or get wrong when they do. Breitbart and Fox got a whole lot more right on a lot of the nonsense ginned up about Trump. They've pointed out a host of fallacies, misconceptions, and lies told about Trump. They were far more accurate and ultimately right about the Russia hoax, the impeachment hoax, the obstruction hoax, and a whole lot more, than was the leftist media.

That's true of many "conservative" or libertarian bloggers such as those whose videos I've posted and you've dismissed via this method of pointing out a thing that you think is negative about them personally, and so dismiss, avoid, the content of their message which you were not able to dispute.

Your method is a recipe for remaining willfully ignorant. How useful was your source for the fish tank cleaner drinkers?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

This is one of the reasons you remain ignorant. And by ignorant, I don't mean stupid. I mean the non-judgmental definition--uninformed or misinformed. You pick one supposedly or reputedly negative thing or name about something or someone and then judge the whole by it. What site, or news agency or TV network does not have at least one person or commentator or program that many think is bat$hit crazy? Are your relied on sources purely free of any such blights? So you dismiss what could be enlightening information by ignorantly casting a negative light on the entire source.

And your ignorance may not be entirely innocent. I suspect you disagree with the "world view," as you've put it in the past, or with the political view or slant, of Breitbart, or Fox New, or various bloggers, etc., so you intentionally pick something you think is negative about them, point that out, then think you've proved that they are to be scorned and dismissed.

Breitbart and Fox news are excellent sources for things that the left leaning media avoid covering or get wrong when they do. Breitbart and Fox got a whole lot more right on a lot of the nonsense ginned up about Trump. They've pointed out a host of fallacies, misconceptions, and lies told about Trump. They were far more accurate and ultimately right about the Russia hoax, the impeachment hoax, the obstruction hoax, and a whole lot more, than was the leftist media.

That's true of many "conservative" or libertarian bloggers such as those whose videos I've posted and you've dismissed via this method of pointing out a thing that you think is negative about them personally, and so dismiss, avoid, the content of their message which you were not able to dispute.

Your method is a recipe for remaining willfully ignorant. How useful was your source for the fish tank cleaner drinkers?

Another one who refuses to accept who planted the seed ,,, your kool aid drinkers on tube are just birds of the same conspiracy feather. Only you would expect others to dispute a guy you tube , opinion rather than presented facts

Maybe you should ride your high horse over there and read the comments, then come back and tells us what you think , because you clearly have no idea how extremist their views are , hiding behind words like patriotism and MANGA

The volume of hate and vitriol is amazing. Our forum is respectfully and moderate in comparison. Notice the ads here , I've attached 1 from their site

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Another one who refuses to accept who planted the seed ,,, your kool aid drinkers on tube are just birds of the same conspiracy feather. Only you would expect others to dispute a guy you tube , opinion rather than presented facts

Maybe you should ride your high horse over there and read the comments, then come back and tells us what you think , because you clearly have no idea how extremist their views are , hiding behind words like patriotism and MANGA

The volume of hate and vitriol is amazing. Our forum is respectfully and moderate in comparison. Notice the ads here , I've attached 1 from their site

There you go again. Demonstrating what I said you do.

And wanting Hillary to be brought to justice is not extreme. A great many Americans, not an extreme fringe, feel that way.

And much of what is in Breitbart is information and commentary from the "conservative" prospective that you won't find in leftist outlets.

And if you think that asking for a vote is hate, vitriol, and extreme, then I can understand why you side with Progressives.

Progressives seem to have this notion that anything they don't agree with is extreme . . . as well as hateful, racist, and all the rest of the mantra.