added credibility to Bidens accuser?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Paul, tell me where this is wrong, please...

In the Kavanaugh mess, democrats believed that on the basis of an accusation, Kavanaugh was guilty and should step down. They are using a very different standard with Biden.

Nothing to do with Trump or Republicans.

So let me get this straight you expect that after the Democrats saw how the Republicans refused to investigate credible evidence of Kavanaugh (and Trump) now you expect them do the opposite of what Republicans did? It has everything to do with Trump Kavanaugh and the Republicans
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So let me get this straight you expect that after the Democrats saw how the Republicans refused to investigate credible evidence of Kavanaugh (and Trump)

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

this is hilariously stupid....were you alive then?...remember the rape trains story?, wasn't Michael Aveniati going to be the next democrat president? and that complete loon Balsy Ford... It was beaten to death by the fools here, the media and the democrats...all beyond shameful partisan hacks... and it was all BS...the left turned the entire process into an circus... that wasn't enough for you?? good grief ..."WE NEED MORE INVESTIGATION....THEY DIDN'T TALK TO SO AND SO"...shut up...we're on biden now...try to stick to the topic

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

this is hilariously stupid....were you alive then?...remember the rape trains story?, wasn't Michael Aveniati going to be the next democrat president? and that complete loon Balsy Ford... It was beaten to death by the fools here, the media and the democrats...all beyond shameful partisan hacks... and it was all BS...the left turned the entire process into an circus... that wasn't enough for you?? good grief ..."WE NEED MORE INVESTIGATION....THEY DIDN'T TALK TO SO AND SO"...shut up...we're on biden now...try to stick to the topic

go take a walk you need a break
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

go take a walk you need a break
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

fished all morning

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by scottw

fished all morning

Nice
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

we're on biden now...try to stick to the topic

Not one of them...not one...can do so. It's something to see.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Not one of them...not one...can do so. It's something to see.

but but Obama.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

but but Obama.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

What does Obama have to do with this, exactly?

Did you see that Barack went golfing on an empty country club golf course, while Michelle recorded a message sent to all phones in DC, telling citizens to stay home unless it was urgent?

Think for a second, of the sheer and utter contempt you'd have to have for the little people, to tell them to stay inside while your husband is hitting the links! That's liberalism, though...it's never about what "they:" should do, always about what "we" should do. "They" are entitled to live better than us...what a swell couple they must be.

If the republic survived those two czars, we can survive this clown just fine.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

What does Obama have to do with this, exactly?

Did you see that Barack went golfing on an empty country club golf course, while Michelle recorded a message sent to all phones in DC, telling citizens to stay home unless it was urgent?

Think for a second, of the sheer and utter contempt you'd have to have for the little people, to tell them to stay inside while your husband is hitting the links! That's liberalism, though...it's never about what "they:" should do, always about what "we" should do. "They" are entitled to live better than us...what a swell couple they must be.

If the republic survived those two czars, we can survive this clown just fine.

How many times have we heard but but Obama? Why do we have to just talk about Biden when there's a direct contradiction by what the Republicans have done or should I say what the Republicans have not done. Think about the utter contempt shown by the Republican leaders for anyone who is not a trumplican and not deranged by their love of Trump - day in and day out when Trump gets up there and lies and insult people and they keep their mouth shut. Did they get all tingly when he stood up on the stage and made fun of retards and spazzes? That's what conservativism has turned into these days. If it wasn't so sad it would be hysterical.

And tell me what Obama's playing golf has anything to do with this thread? You've humiliated yourself again here
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

And tell me what Obama's playing golf has anything to do with this thread?


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

hypocrisy....what...you couldn't figure that out?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

How many times have we heard but but Obama? Why do we have to just talk about Biden when there's a direct contradiction by what the Republicans have done or should I say what the Republicans have not done. Think about the utter contempt shown by the Republican leaders for anyone who is not a trumplican and not deranged by their love of Trump - day in and day out when Trump gets up there and lies and insult people and they keep their mouth shut. Did they get all tingly when he stood up on the stage and made fun of retards and spazzes? That's what conservativism has turned into these days. If it wasn't so sad it would be hysterical.

And tell me what Obama's playing golf has anything to do with this thread? You've humiliated yourself again here
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"How many times have we heard but but Obama? "

From me? A few at least, to point out glaring double standards. Would a speck of consistency be too much to ask?

"there's a direct contradiction by what the Republicans have done or should I say what the Republicans have not done"

I didn't buy the accusation against Kavanaugh, I'm not buying the one against Biden. Where is the double standard there?

"Think about the utter contempt shown by the Republican leaders for anyone who is not a trumplican'

I see Republican leaders criticizing Trump regularly for his style. So your premise there is seriously flawed. If you are upset that Republicans prefer other Republicans to democrats, I'm very sorry fo rthat.

"Did they get all tingly when he stood up on the stage and made fun of retards and spazzes? "

You ruse of retard is very offensive. When did he make fun of "retards"? And if that's offensive to you, what was your position when Obama made fun of them, when after bowling gutter ball after gutter ball, he joked that he looked like a Special Olympics athlete. That was OK, right? Lemme guess, it was different when Obama did it..

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So let me get this straight you expect that after the Democrats saw how the Republicans refused to investigate credible evidence of Kavanaugh (and Trump) now you expect them do the opposite of what Republicans did? It has everything to do with Trump Kavanaugh and the Republicans
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I see, it's the republicans fault that the dems did a 180 on this.

They postponed the confirmation for a week or ten days, and did an investigation. Not sure what you're referring to when you say there was no investigation.

In any event, the liberal mantra then, was that investigation or no, the accuser was to be believed. Who on the left says they believe Reade?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I see, it's the republicans fault that the dems did a 180 on this.

They postponed the confirmation for a week or ten days, and did an investigation. Not sure what you're referring to when you say there was no investigation.

In any event, the liberal mantra then, was that investigation or no, the accuser was to be believed. Who on the left says they believe Reade?

The investigation was a sham and people who said they have pertinent information never were investigated by the FBI. The liberal media is the one who broke the story. It's the height of hypocrisy to expect the Democrats to do something that the Republicans refuse to do and to try to hold them to a different standard that the Republicans were held. You're the one who constantly says the Republicans have more morals then the Democrats yet in this instance you expect more out of the Democrats.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

The investigation was a sham and people who said they have pertinent information never were investigated by the FBI. The liberal media is the one who broke the story. It's the height of hypocrisy to expect the Democrats to do something that the Republicans refuse to do and to try to hold them to a different standard that the Republicans were held. You're the one who constantly says the Republicans have more morals then the Democrats yet in this instance you expect more out of the Democrats.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"The investigation was a sham "

I see. First there was no investigation, now you say there was one, but it was a sham.

One the people that Ford listed as a corroborating witness, said not only did she have zero recollection of the attack, but that Ford's lawyers pressured her to lie. No red flags there!

"It's the height of hypocrisy to expect the Democrats to do something that the Republicans refuse to do"

How about asking the democrats to do the same exact thing they did during the Kavanaugh spectacle - believe the woman? WHy is that so outlandish?

Paul, we now know for a certainty, that democrats do not "believe all women"...only women who accuse Republicans.

What the GOP is asking for, is for the democrats to be consistent. But we can't have that, can we?

You're humiliating yourself here like the rest of them.

All of the liberals believed Kavanaugh's accuser, based solely on the accusation. None of those people, believe this accuser. Despite the fact that this accuser has a ton more corroborating evidence, and unlike Kavanaughs accuser (who admitted she hated the thought of a conservative being on the bench), Reade is a democrat who worked for Biden, and therefore cannot be accused of being driven by partisanship.

Despite all that, the "believe all women" bullsh*t went the way of the dodo pretty quick.

Biden himself, said we have a duty to believe the accuser. Why isn't he saying that now? Why does he deserve more protection than Brett Kavanaugh? Can you at east attempt to answer that?

You guys are HYSTERICAL.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"The investigation was a sham "

I see. First there was no investigation, now you say there was one, but it was a sham.

" I've been giving you far too much credit. There was no investigation of trump there was a sham investigation of Kavanaugh. I thought you knew that but again I think I've been giving you far too much credit"

One the people that Ford listed as a corroborating witness, said not only did she have zero recollection of the attack, but that Ford's lawyers pressured her to lie. No red flags there!

"It's the height of hypocrisy to expect the Democrats to do something that the Republicans refuse to do"
How about asking the democrats to do the same exact thing they did during the Kavanaugh spectacle - believe the woman? WHy is that so outlandish?

" I told you it's the height of hypocrisy to expect the Democrats to do something that the Republicans refuse to do."
Paul, we now know for a certainty, that democrats do not "believe all women"...only women who accuse Republicans.

What the GOP is asking for, is for the democrats to be consistent. But we can't have that, can we?

You're humiliating yourself here like the rest of them.

"I think you've have humiliated yourself here by expecting the Democrats to do something you haven't required to Republicans to do. Look up the word hypocrisy there might be a picture of you there"
All of the liberals believed Kavanaugh's accuser, based solely on the accusation. None of those people, believe this accuser. Despite the fact that this accuser has a ton more corroborating evidence, and unlike Kavanaughs accuser (who admitted she hated the thought of a conservative being on the bench), Reade is a democrat who worked for Biden, and therefore cannot be accused of being driven by partisanship.

Despite all that, the "believe all women" bullsh*t went the way of the dodo pretty quick.

Biden himself, said we have a duty to believe the accuser. Why isn't he saying that now? Why does he deserve more protection than Brett Kavanaugh? Can you at east attempt to answer that?

You guys are HYSTERICAL.

As I said it's HYSTERICAL to watch you demand something out of the Democrats that you don't expect out of the Republicans. Look up the word hypocrisy why don't you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

As I said it's HYSTERICAL to watch you demand something out of the Democrats that you don't expect out of the Republicans. Look up the word hypocrisy why don't you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Demanding? When did I demand anything? I'm not demanding squat. I'm asking for an explanation of the flip-flop, and thoroughly enjoying watching you guys bend over like contortionists because you can't bring yourself to say, "yes, they are being hypocrites on this". That's OBVIOUSLY the case, but you can't bring yourself to say it.

Anyway, when did I make demands? Are you feeling OK? You seem to be hearing voices...