Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Glad to hear you hold Alan Underpants in such high regard. I suppose you also agree with his position on statutory rape.
Now Barr is saying Sullivan’s orders and the whole process leading up to Flynn’s conviction and sentencing was illegitimate. At least if Trump were to pardon Flynn, the basic premise that he had, in fact, lied to the FBI and pleaded guilty to it would not be up for dispute. If Barr prevails, though, the most fundamental building blocks of counterintelligence investigations — such as ensuring that the FBI can question people about contacts with hostile foreign agents and hold them accountable if they conceal them — are no longer things we can count on. Barr wants to create a twilight zone where such things can occur with legal impunity.
Apparently it is now a good thing, that the servants of the people dare not question courtiers of the King.
|
"Glad to hear you hold Alan Underpants in such high regard. I suppose you also agree with his position on statutory rape. "
I'm confused. Didn't you very recently post a 50,000 word article written by a former Jeb Bush staffer, to support your position that Trump is bad? Yes, you did. Does that mean you agree with every position that man has ever taken?
So why is it OK for
you to support
your position with words of someone who you don't agree with on other topics, but it's not valid when I do it? I'd just love to hear you attempt to explain that.
Pete, you are again and again, backing yourself into a corner from which there is no escape.
Threaded Mode