|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
05-09-2020, 10:54 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
You’re starting to sound like wdmso.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
The court said there was no legitimate investigatory reason to interview Flynn. That's what they said. Sorry if that doesn't serve your Narrative, but it's what they said.
|
|
|
|
05-09-2020, 11:05 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
The court said there was no legitimate investigatory reason to interview Flynn. That's what they said. Sorry if that doesn't serve your Narrative, but it's what they said.
|
What court?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
05-09-2020, 11:48 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
What court?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Sorry, the DOJ. The DOJ said there was no investigative reason to interview Flynn. The FBI isn't allowed to set people up out of political spite. If that's what happened. I don't know that happened, you don't know that it didn't. The note from the assistant director, asking if the goal is to "get him to lie, or get him fired", is troubling.
|
|
|
|
05-09-2020, 12:01 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
The FBI isn't allowed to set people up out of political spite.
|
And the judge isn’t allowed to accept a guilty plea unless there is evidence of a crime and the defendant has no reasonable defense.
All the DOJ did was file a motion anyway. For the case to be really dismissed the judge who has a very strong reputation would have to do a serious 180...wait for the court to be the next member of the deep state. You’re being played as a fool.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
05-09-2020, 12:06 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
And the judge isn’t allowed to accept a guilty plea unless there is evidence of a crime and the defendant has no reasonable defense.
All the DOJ did was file a motion anyway. For the case to be really dismissed the judge who has a very strong reputation would have to do a serious 180...wait for the court to be the next member of the deep state. You’re being played as a fool.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Ahh, but the documents showing possible fishiness at the start, were just released. Flynn's lawyers definitely did not have access to those, maybe the trial judge didn't either.
"You’re being played as a fool."
Oh, thanks for looking out for me.
|
|
|
|
05-09-2020, 12:42 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,466
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Ahh, but the documents showing possible fishiness at the start, were just released. Flynn's lawyers definitely did not have access to those, maybe the trial judge didn't either.
|
Yes, the notes conveniently released after Flynn fired his reputable council and hired a conspiracy theorist to try and retract his plea. They don’t undermine anything in the case, it’s all just noise to distract you while Barr tries to rewrite history at the behest of the president.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
05-09-2020, 02:08 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
[QUOTE=spence;1193072]Yes, the notes conveniently released after Flynn fired his reputable council and hired a conspiracy theorist to try and retract his plea. They don’t undermine anything in the case, it’s all just noise to distract you while Barr tries to rewrite history at the behest of the president.
[size=1][i]Posted from my iPhone
Even a conspiracy nut can get one right. I'm not a conspiracy nut, and asking if the goal is to get the guy to lie, or to get him fired, is what you'd say if it was a setup.
Either way, the charges will likely be dropped, and we all get to decide what we think of it. I know what your opinion is, and if the political parties were reversed, your opinion would be the exact opposite.
Have you ever noticed that you always side with the democrat? You ever take note of that, and ask yourself why?
As Jordan Peterson calls it, the pathological possession of ideology. You're are enslaved by it, prevented from thinking anything that doesn't fit. If that's wrong, please tell us the biggest single issue, on which you disagree with liberals.
|
|
|
|
05-09-2020, 02:57 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yes, the notes conveniently released after Flynn fired his reputable council and hired a conspiracy theorist to try and retract his plea. They don’t undermine anything in the case, it’s all just noise to distract you while Barr tries to rewrite history at the behest of the president.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
nice conspiracy theory
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.
|
| |