NBC apologizes for deceptively editing Barr remarks

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Show me (other than this thread) where I've insulted you first compared to the many hundreds of times you've insulted me and other people first. I'm sure the others feel the way I do now. Why take Jim's constant insults - just give it back to him the way he insults everybody who he thinks is on the "other side"
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

We talked about this...throwing out the word retard is deeply, deeply offensive to most people. But once again, you get to decide that it's OK when you use it.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

We talked about this...throwing out the word retard is deeply, deeply offensive to most people. But once again, you get to decide that it's OK when you use it.

see post 60

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

see post 60

I saw it many times. In your mind, it was defensible. I can say the same thing about my posts.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I saw it many times. In your mind, it was defensible. I can say the same thing about my posts.

So calling Dems. whores and people pussy, commenting on women's look is defensible?

Tell us again what a good Christian churchgoer you are.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So calling Dems. whores and people pussy, commenting on women's look is defensible?

Tell us again what a good Christian churchgoer you are.

Like you, I do it when it's done to me (or in his case, my mother, or my wife, or TDF's kids). It's OK for you to retaliate, but wrong when anyone ese does it.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Like you, I do it when it's done to me (or in his case, my mother, or my wife, or TDF's kids). It's OK for you to retaliate, but wrong when anyone ese does it.

That is not what I said.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

That is not what I said.

OK. Have you ever criticized a fellow liberal, for insults here? I have suggested to Dangles that he back off, on multiple occasions.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So calling Dems. whores .

Not "dems". I use the whore label for any elected official who screws their constituents for money. I specifically called John Rowland, a Republican, a whore, and you know that, so you are now lying because the truth doesn't fit your argument. But in CT, the overwhelming majority of elected officials who have screwed us for money, happen to be democrats. While it might make you feel better if I blamed our problems in CT on Newt Gingrich and Pat Buchanan, that would also be stupid.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Not "dems". I use the whore label for any elected official who screws their constituents for money. I specifically called John Rowland, a Republican, a whore, and you know that, so you are now lying because the truth doesn't fit your argument. But in CT, the overwhelming majority of elected officials who have screwed us for money, happen to be democrats. While it might make you feel better if I blamed our problems in CT on Newt Gingrich and Pat Buchanan, that would also be stupid.

You're a liar. You call Dems. whores. Then you tried to justify it when I called you out. You constantly make fun of to women's looks.

I always laugh when you come back and quote the same post multiple times.

"AND ANOTHER THING...…"

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

You're a liar. You call Dems. whores. Then you tried to justify it when I called you out. You constantly make fun of to women's looks.

I always laugh when you come back and quote the same post multiple times.

"AND ANOTHER THING...…"

I called the dems in CT who screwed us for money, whores. If the Republicans controlled the legislature for 95% of the last 40 years and did this to us, I'd call them whores. But unfortunately for you, it was democrats.

"You constantly make fun of to women's looks. "

So to you, making fun of Rachael Maddow is more objectionable, than his calling my mother a whore, my wife Da Pussy, and attacking Kevin's kids.

That makes all kinds of sense Paul. Stick with that.