|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
05-14-2020, 07:07 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
The FBI served a warrant on Senator Richard Burr tonight and seized his cell phone.
Next?
|
Any reason why you don't think Feinstein should be next? Or does that "D" after her name give her blanket immunity for everything?
These people, if guilty, deserve severe and public punishment. And that gal in GA who says only her advisers make moves, but they sold airline and energy stocks and bought stocks in companies that sell technology to people that work from home. Gimme a break.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 07:15 AM
|
#2
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,415
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Any reason why you don't think Feinstein should be next? Or does that "D" after her name give her blanket immunity for everything?
These people, if guilty, deserve severe and public punishment. And that gal in GA who says only her advisers make moves, but they sold airline and energy stocks and bought stocks in companies that sell technology to people that work from home. Gimme a break.
|
I hope they are looking at all of them, I have to imagine that Trump's crew i pushing them to get the dems if there is evidence. If Feisntein and others truly are in a blind trust as claimed and there is no evidence they contact (or can't prove) they contacted the person managing the trust, then it is a harder case to prove. The Burr case seems a bit more obvious that he dumped stock, as did family members if I recall.
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 08:32 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
I hope they are looking at all of them, I have to imagine that Trump's crew i pushing them to get the dems if there is evidence. If Feisntein and others truly are in a blind trust as claimed and there is no evidence they contact (or can't prove) they contacted the person managing the trust, then it is a harder case to prove. The Burr case seems a bit more obvious that he dumped stock, as did family members if I recall.
|
Agreed, it's a safe bet that Trump isn't telling the DOJ to focus on Republicans.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 08:46 AM
|
#4
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,415
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Agreed, it's a safe bet that Trump isn't telling the DOJ to focus on Republicans.
|
Which likely means whatever they have on Burr is pretty obvious, it seems....
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 08:50 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
Which likely means whatever they have on Burr is pretty obvious, it seems....
|
Correct, likely he was the one dumb enough to not cover his tracks.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 08:53 AM
|
#6
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,415
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Correct, likely he was the one dumb enough to not cover his tracks.
|
He was also dumb (egotistical) enough to not have it in a trust which would be a good CYA....
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 09:18 AM
|
#7
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,449
|
This escalation is worth watching closely—because while Burr’s pre-pandemic stock sales look totally rotten, this investigation also raises questions about Barr targeting the one powerful Republican who authenticated the Russia investigation and is working on the final report in his committee’s 3-1/2 year long Russia probe. The goal has been to get it done and released in next couple months.
He also was seen as leading the effort to subpoena Donald Trump Jr. a year ago. Going after the mob boss’ family is a bad career move, and can get you made into a public example as a message to anyone else thinking of breaking ranks.
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 07:50 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Any reason why you don't think Feinstein should be next? Or does that "D" after her name give her blanket immunity for everything?
These people, if guilty, deserve severe and public punishment. And that gal in GA who says only her advisers make moves, but they sold airline and energy stocks and bought stocks in companies that sell technology to people that work from home. Gimme a break.
|
They prob. looked at Feinstein and the other 3 also. What exactly did Feinstein do though? The woman in GA's case can easily be defended against if there is no contact between her and her broker. Plus Burr is the only one who got secret briefings. I think Burr was one of only a few Sen. to vote on a law baring Sen? from owning or buying/selling stocks.
Last edited by PaulS; 05-14-2020 at 07:56 AM..
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 08:14 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
They prob. looked at Feinstein and the other 3 also. What exactly did Feinstein do though? The woman in GA's case can easily be defended against if there is no contact between her and her broker. Plus Burr is the only one who got secret briefings. I think Burr was one of only a few Sen. to vote on a law baring Sen? from owning or buying/selling stocks.
|
'What exactly did Feinstein do though?'
The same thing Burr did, probably.
"Plus Burr is the only one who got secret briefings."
Wasn't it everyone on that specific committee? And senators don't talk to each other?
The republican woman in GA, if she really had no contact and her advisers dumped airlines and energy and bought CITRIX, they are the greatest stockpickers in the history of the world. Contact is as easy to hide, as telling a staffer to tell someone else to contact the broker. Her husband is/was the president of the New York Stock Exchange.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 08:45 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
'What exactly did Feinstein do though?'
The same thing Burr did, probably.
"Plus Burr is the only one who got secret briefings."
Wasn't it everyone on that specific committee? And senators don't talk to each other?
The republican woman in GA, if she really had no contact and her advisers dumped airlines and energy and bought CITRIX, they are the greatest stockpickers in the history of the world. Contact is as easy to hide, as telling a staffer to tell someone else to contact the broker. Her husband is/was the president of the New York Stock Exchange.
|
I've told you a # of times, Feinstein didn't make the sale (1), her husband did. He (she) is one of the richest Sen. and what they sold is a tiny % of their wealth compared to Burr's sales/wealth.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 08:51 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I've told you a # of times, Feinstein didn't make the sale (1), her husband did. He (she) is one of the richest Sen. and what they sold is a tiny % of their wealth compared to Burr's sales/wealth.
|
And it's not possible, that she told him to do it. Burr's brother sold stock, most people take that as evidence of guilt.
Martha Stewart went to prison for practically pennies. The uber wealthy can be funny with their money.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 09:38 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
And it's not possible, that she told him to do it. Of course it is possible.Burr's brother sold stock, most people take that as evidence of guilt.
Martha Stewart went to prison for practically pennies. The uber wealthy can be funny with their money.
|
The point is that Burr sold a larger share of his holdings after receiving a confidential briefing that the other Sen. did not receive. Feinstein's husband sold the 1 stock, not her. He made his wealth founding/owning an investment company. Burr's sales all were perfect.
And that is why politicians of both parties called out Burr but not the other 3 - even while mentioning them. The others all have believable stories - burr not so much.
|
|
|
|
05-14-2020, 01:49 PM
|
#13
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,415
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
The point is that Burr sold a larger share of his holdings after receiving a confidential briefing that the other Sen. did not receive. Feinstein's husband sold the 1 stock, not her. He made his wealth founding/owning an investment company. Burr's sales all were perfect.
And that is why politicians of both parties called out Burr but not the other 3 - even while mentioning them. The others all have believable stories - burr not so much.
|
Feinstien's spokesperson said that she was already questioned by the FBI. We'll see what comes of all this....
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.
|
| |