NBC apologizes for deceptively editing Barr remarks

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I don't think there is any comparison between the daily insults you and the other conserv. throw out here. .

In other words, no, you have never criticized a democrat. Pete went after TDFs children, called my mother a truck stop whore, called my wife Da Pussy. You can't speak against it. But I make fin of Rachael Maddow, and you get all bent out of shape.

Paul, all that matters is politics. We get it.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

In other words, no, you have never criticized a democrat. Pete went after TDFs children, called my mother a truck stop whore, called my wife Da Pussy. You can't speak against it. But I make fin of Rachael Maddow, and you get all bent out of shape.

Paul, all that matters is politics. We get it.

You're constantly insulting people here - even PRIOR to anyone saying a word to you. You start posts with insults in them. So don't claim you don't have a part in it. He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was. Bad but not quite the same. Your on here 7 days a week - night and day. You refer to Dems as "the other side" as if people are at war. TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you. You've complained that Pete makes too many posts but for 8-10 years you had by far the most posts here. So how much is too many posts? Is it one more than you make?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

So don't claim you don't have a part in it. He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was. Bad but not quite the same. Your on here 7 days a week - night and day. You refer to Dems as "the other side" as if people are at war. TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you. You've complained that Pete makes too many posts but for 8-10 years you had by far the most posts here. So how much is too many posts? Is it one more than you make?

"So don't claim you don't have a part in it" I never, ever claimed I don't do it.

"He didn't call your mom a whore - he asked if she was"

If that's true, it's a distinction without any difference. He didn't make interrogatories about my wife or a bout TDF's children. He made statements. Statements that you didn't object to. Not only did you not object to what he said about TDF's kids, you objected when I called him out on it. You had no problem with what Pete said, but you had a problem when I called him out. But when you don't like what someone says, it's heroic when you call them out. Go ahead and explain that.


"TDF can defend himself and I don't think he needs you"

Yes he can, you're right. Apparently the only one who can't defend himself, is the only tattletale here. That's you. And again, it's OK when YOU criticize me for insulting others, but when I criticize someone else for insults, you say the insult recipient doesn't need my help. Does Rachael Maddow, Hilary Clinton, and Dan Malloy need your help? WHy do you defend them against me? How is that any different than what I did? Here's the difference. TDF is here, and they're not, and TDFs kids didn't do anything to Pete. So I'd call him out again for that in a second.

You and I are doing the same exact thing (we both use insults, we both criticize others for using over-the-top insults), but it's heroic when you do it, problematic when I do it.

"You've complained that Pete makes too many posts "

I point out, correctly (not complain) about how many anti-Trump threads he starts. I don't care how often he posts in a general sense. I could care less, and don't keep track, wouldn't even know how to look it up.

When you stop using insults, I'll recognize your position to tell me not to do the same. When you stop calling others out when they use insults you don't like, I'll recognize your position to tell me not to do the same.