Trump Ally Roger Stone Gets 40 Months for Lying, Witness-Tampering

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

Yea those oppressive regulations were really holding the economy back.

Yes they were that's one of the reasons the economy quickly expanded after the regs were dropped.

And I forgot the SCOTUS has the power to dissolve amendments
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

When Judges rule by personal preference rather than constitutional text, it then becomes a numbers game. Five or more votes decides. Simple as that. Progressive jurisprudence promotes, among other things, adjudication by what are perceived as higher moral principles or social justice rather than strict adherence to text.

Simply bring a test case to the court to challenge previous rulings or text, have five or more thoroughly Progressive Judges on the court . . . voila . . . change.

[spence]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Yes they were that's one of the reasons the economy quickly expanded after the regs were dropped.

That’s not even remotely true. Not sure if you’re just blatantly lying or ignorant.

When Judges rule by personal preference rather than constitutional text, it then becomes a numbers game. Five or more votes decides. Simple as that. Progressive jurisprudence promotes, among other things, adjudication by what are perceived as higher moral principles or social justice rather than strict adherence to text.

Simply bring a test case to the court to challenge previous rulings or text, have five or more thoroughly Progressive Judges on the court . . . voila . . . change.

Still doesn’t invalidate an amendment.

Next.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

That’s not even remotely true. Not sure if you’re just blatantly lying or ignorant.

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

prickly snowflake

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

prickly snowflake

Both hands on the keyboard.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

That’s not even remotely true. Not sure if you’re just blatantly lying or ignorant.

The claim may be exaggerated, but some deregulation helped along with the tax cuts and with the generally pro business tenor.

Still doesn’t invalidate an amendment.

The Court can basically void an amendment by neglect. And by "interpreting" it on the basis of "need" or "good reason" or any problem of gun violence that it deems that it currently deems so egregious that public safety requires gun ownership to be restricted to near uselessness in the case of the 2A.

This article notices a trend in that direction: https://dailycaller.com/2020/06/16/s...endment-cases/

Next.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Elections and the Court. And the Constitution.