RNC Convention

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I think it's highly likely some of the speakers are Q. Most of the RNC sh!tshow appears tuned to plug right into their crazy.

Will be interesting to see how many Repubs won't sign off on the bi-partisan bill to denounce it.

Was the story of the pardoned bank robber, who started a program to help convicts re-enter society, a sh*t show?

Or the Maine lobsterman, or immigrant business owner, who say Trumps policies helped their businesses?

Nick Sandman talking about his experiences with the dangers of a media that cares about politics more than facts? That had no validity?

Or all the blacks taking abiut Trumps agenda, like Herscel alker, Tim Scott, or the young AG from KY? They're just a means to tap into crazy?

The lady telling Mike Pence what school choice meant to her and her son, nothing there worth seeing? What exactly, is the argument against that anyway? Don't liberals like to say they are in favor of choice? Pretty sure I heard that somewhere.

And Julia Louis Dreyfuss at the DNC, making fun of Mike Pence's name, that was Churchill-level discourse?

I still think Trump gets creamed. And there were horrible speakers (at both conventions), I hated listening to the former FL AG talk about Biden's family.

But the DNC was a "lets hate Trump"-pallooza which was very light on policy and the expected effects of said policy. AT the RNC, I hear a lot about actual policy, and people explaining how that policy impacted them. Instead of sociology professors theorizing about how policies impact us.

Spence, when you can't refute the message, you cam dismiss it as a sh*t show very easily. you have a long established habit of lobbing baseless insults.