nancy pelosi inside closed hair salon without a mask

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

The grifter strikes again

The U.S. Justice Department is seeking to take over the defense of President Donald Trump in a defamation suit brought by advice columnist E. Jean Carroll, who claims Trump raped her two decades ago.

The move could further delay a suit in which Carroll is demanding potentially damaging evidence from Trump during the final weeks before the presidential election, including a deposition and a DNA sample to compare to a dress she claims she was wearing at the time of the alleged attack. It could also leave taxpayers on the hook for any damages awarded in the case.

His campaign has already paid his private attorney 850K and now they need money, is Barr volunteers the DOJ to take over his defense, unbelievable.
Grifters gotta grift
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Once again you manage to bring in all manner of anti-Trump stuff not related to the subject of the thread. I guess it's because you can't start your own threads anymore. You're a sneaky dude. In some basic ways you're a lot like Trump. Even worse.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Once again you manage to bring in all manner of anti-Trump stuff not related to the subject of the thread. I guess it's because you can't start your own threads anymore. You're a sneaky dude. In some basic ways you're a lot like Trump. Even worse.

Really that’s the first time you noticed this thread, like almost every thread ever started in this forum for years, strayed from the initial theme? Hey since I know you love promoting Trump doing a bang up job, like falsely “promising” a vaccine ahead of the election, only to have the CEO’s of all pharmaceutical companies signing a letter saying hold the phone that isn’t so. Astra Zeneca has already had to pause its trial due some adverse reactions. So is he doing a good job by that statement or as anyone with a brain can deduce, using it for purely political gains. By doing so he also might put concern about how safe a vaccine is when one finally comes out. The list of personal interest only comments he has made as it relates to this Covid crisis is a long embarrassing one, which I’m certain you can break out some blue to dispute.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Really that’s the first time you noticed this thread, like almost every thread ever started in this forum for years, strayed from the initial theme?

Nope. Not the first time I've noticed. Mentioned it
several times before.

Hey since I know you love promoting Trump doing a bang up job,

Nope. Don't promote Trump. Your tin ears may prevent you from hearing that I constantly say, for me, it's not about Trump.

like falsely “promising” a vaccine ahead of the election, only to have the CEO’s of all pharmaceutical companies signing a letter saying hold the phone that isn’t so. Astra Zeneca has already had to pause its trial due some adverse reactions. So is he doing a good job by that statement or as anyone with a brain can deduce, using it for purely political gains. By doing so he also might put concern about how safe a vaccine is when one finally comes out. The list of personal interest only comments he has made as it relates to this Covid crisis is a long embarrassing one, which I’m certain you can break out some blue to dispute.

I'm not going to dispute what someone promises. Actually, all the discussions about the competence or lack thereof in handling covid are too politically oriented for me to care about. There is still a limited amount of things we know and can do. That has pretty much been handled, as far as I can see, as well as they can by our "experts"--"can" existing within political and medical disputations and oppositions. That "clown show" has been apparent on all "sides" for an objective point of view to take seriously. Believe in whatever clowns you wish.

[Pete F.]

Places around the world that used masks consistently have had half to two-thirds less Covid spread. Imagine how many deaths could have been prevented in the US if the federal government had focused on masks rather than hydroxychloroquine.

One way to make sure our COVID-19 crisis doesn't look quite so bad compared to the rest of the world is to destroy all USAID COVID-19 health programs overseas, offering no assistance to poorer countries.
Yes, it's happening. Inadequate political & economic action to address COVID-19 impact will lead to greater instability in fragile countries.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I'm not going to dispute what someone promises. Actually, all the discussions about the competence or lack thereof in handling covid are too politically oriented for me to care about. There is still a limited amount of things we know and can do. That has pretty much been handled, as far as I can see, as well as they can by our "experts"--"can" existing within political and medical disputations and oppositions. That "clown show" has been apparent on all "sides" for an objective point of view to take seriously. Believe in whatever clowns you wish.

It's obvious what clown you believe in

President Trump’s head popped up during his top-secret intelligence briefing in the Oval Office on Jan. 28 when the discussion turned to the novel coronavirus outbreak in China.

“This will be the biggest national security threat you face in your presidency,” national security adviser Robert O’Brien told Trump, according to a new book by Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward. “This is going to be the roughest thing you face.”

Matthew Pottinger, the deputy national security adviser, agreed. He told the president that after reaching contacts in China, it was evident that the world faced a health emergency on par with the flu pandemic of 1918, which killed an estimated 50 million people worldwide.

Ten days later, Trump called Woodward and revealed that he thought the situation was far more dire than what he had been saying publicly.

“You just breathe the air and that’s how it’s passed,” Trump said in a Feb. 7 call. “And so that’s a very tricky one. That’s a very delicate one. It’s also more deadly than even your strenuous flu.”

“This is deadly stuff,” the president repeated for emphasis.

At that time, Trump was telling the nation that the virus was no worse than a seasonal flu, predicting it would soon disappear, and insisting that the U.S. government had it totally under control. It would be several weeks before he would publicly acknowledge that the virus was no ordinary flu and that it could be transmitted through the air.

Trump admitted to Woodward on March 19 that he deliberately minimized the danger. “I wanted to always play it down,” the president said.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

It's obvious what clown you believe in

The clown I believe in is the U.S. Constitution.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

The clown I believe in is the U.S. Constitution.

You spend a lot of time defending Tweety, why you probably think he should get a Nobel Peace Prize, that would be like giving Jeffrey Dahmer a James Beard Award.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You spend a lot of time defending Tweety, why you probably think he should get a Nobel Peace Prize, that would be like giving Jeffrey Dahmer a James Beard Award.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I spend a lot of time countering or debunking your attacks on Trump, which you spend a lot of time doing. I am not defending Trump because I think he should get a Nobel Peace Prize (BTW, I have no admiration for that politicized "prize"). Trump happens to be the candidate running against the Progressive tool. Pure and simple, that's the reason I "defend" Trump.

Not sure, but if I keep reminding you of that, maybe you might finally realize it. It does seem strange that you seem to prefer to see lies that are repeated over and over as the truth, but when I tell you the truth of what my motivation is over and over, you treat it as if it were a lie and to be ignored.