California wildfires: This is how mind-bogglingly huge they are

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Trump has said things that should have been done about wildfires in California. Now we have to blame Trump for wildfires in California. California Governor Newsom would approve.

I see... you think its about blaming the dear leader


Far from it.... Just showing another example of his clear lack of leadership and contempt for the American people . And their strife .. unless that strife can be turned in to a vote or benfit him political he could care less but you and I already know that . It's our responses to this info that differs

HOW could so many people on the right and left , military and non military some whom Trump and supporters championed sung their praises from the highest roof tops .. filled positions in his Government, only to disparage them or question their patriotism when they spoke out about the dear leader ..

I was told this long ago. .. if 1 person calls you a horse. Thats Fine

10 people call you a horse check your ass you probably have have a tail

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

I see... you think its about blaming the dear leader

Far from it.... Just showing another example of his clear lack of leadership

So you're not blaming him for a lack of leadership, you're merely accusing him of it.

So if his leadership is lacking re the California wildfires, what good it do for those fires if he showed what you consider the proper leadership? Would it help to reduce the number and severity of those fires? Or would it just be a bunch of unimportant but very nice words that had no relation to or effect on the number and severity of fires?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

So you're not blaming him for a lack of leadership, you're merely accusing him of it.

So if his leadership is lacking re the California wildfires, what good it do for those fires if he showed what you consider the proper leadership? Would it help to reduce the number and severity of those fires? Or would it just be a bunch of unimportant but very nice words that had no relation to or effect on the number and severity of fires?

Not accusations its fact he has no leadership skills 30 years in correction and the military have clearly shown me what true leadership looks like as well as bad leadership

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Not accusations its fact he has no leadership skills

I don't know what importance or effect his leadership has re the California fires unless it leads to less fires and less severity. What do you propose his leadership do for California? Just say nice, "right," stuff or give them something as token of leadership? To what avail, other than helping to reduce the fires?

So if it's a fact that he has no leadership, it is sufficient to simply say so. Bringing in the California fires and not pointing out of what purpose or good his leadership would be for those fires is goofy.

its fact he has no leadership skills 30 years in correction and the military have clearly shown me what true leadership looks like as well as bad leadership

Maybe you need 30 years in building construction in the city of NY, and in the world, to further enlighten you on the matter.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Maybe you need 30 years in building construction in the city of NY, and in the world, to further enlighten you on the matter.

It's clear you dont understand what leadership traits are.. Seeing you think building something,, some how translates leadership ... hes not banging nails or engineering plans. Hes just paying people to do those things , sometimes he pays them

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by wdmso

It's clear you dont understand what leadership traits are.. Seeing you think building something,, some how translates leadership ... hes not banging nails or engineering plans. Hes just paying people to do those things , sometimes he pays them

I hope this is just some off the cuff remark that you didn't apply your ability to think critically or analytically or to just plain think. Or maybe it's excusable because you had a few too many of your favorite bubbles? Because if this took any kind of actual effort to think about what you're saying . . . if so . . . then you're really too brain impaired to have a rational conversation with.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by detbuch

I hope this is just some off the cuff remark that you didn't apply your ability to think critically or analytically or to just plain think. Or maybe it's excusable because you had a few too many of your favorite bubbles? Because if this took any kind of actual effort to think about what you're saying . . . if so . . . then you're really too brain impaired to have a rational conversation with.

So you weren't suggesting building stuff equals leadership..? With your 30years of bulilding stuff in NY .. Comment?

Is blaming the WHO for your pandemic response or china or blue state. Is that leadership?

Or how about Trump claiming he was trying not to panic Americans

He seems not to have a problem trying to create fear and panic in Americans over the protest and protesters or bidens future plans to dismantle white suburbia .. how about that leadership..

Or even better why dont you tell us what leadership Traits you see in Trump

I doubt even you see lying as easily as breathing, rude obnoxious failure to accept responsibility. As qualities of a good leader. So whats left to make Trump a leader in your eyes? And any other of Trumps Faithful here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device