Oh boy....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

He has a wonderful gift of always suggesting his examples are some how relevant. And presents them as the same.. or use what is and what isnt in Constitution as a justification for Republicans misdeeds from garland to this gerrymandering it goes on and on
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it was YOUR example. You said a
minimum of 50 days, when obama
used a lot less. how was that my example?

are you saying republicans need to spend 50 days, but democrats can spend less time? if so, just say it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

it was YOUR example. You said a
minimum of 50 days, when obama
used a lot less. how was that my example?

are you saying republicans need to spend 50 days, but democrats can spend less time? if so, just say it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Not talking about the act of naming a nominee .. but the process of vetting said nominee.. remind me did Garland even get a senate vote?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Not talking about the act of naming a nominee .. but the process of vetting said nominee.. remind me did Garland even get a senate vote?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ginsburgs entire process took 40-something days. you can’t win this one.

no he didn’t get a senate vote, because america freely chose to give senate control to republicans. and elections have consequences, at least that’s what we’re told when democrats win.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

ginsburgs entire process took 40-something days. you can’t win this one.

no he didn’t get a senate vote, because america freely chose to give senate control to republicans. and elections have consequences, at least that’s what we’re told when democrats win.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim you keep saying this bs Americans didnt vote to give Republicans the senate to block one presidential nominee and fast track another's nominee .. or are you again suggesting like Trump we have 2 Americas 1 blue and 1 red.. so the reason the held of garlad was a manufactured lie.. from turtle boy..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

so the reason the held of garlad was a manufactured lie.. from turtle boy..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"so the reason the held of garlad was a manufactured lie"

Sort of. I can't explain why McConnell didn't just say "Obama can nominate who he wants, and the senate can do what we want with that nomination". It was idiotic to say that the proximity to the election had anything to do with it.

I'll ask you what I keep asking Pete, which he keeps dodging. Are democrats not guilty of the same exact hypocrisy? Biden said when Bush 41 was POTUS, that no nominations should be made in an election year, they even called that the Biden rule. Then Biden obviously flip flopped in 2016.

So if McConnell lied, Biden told the same exact lie, and for the same exact reason. And you're voting for Biden. So if you're OK with democrats flip-flopping to get what they want on any given day, how can you complain when republicans do the same thing?

Have fun with that...