? for dems on likely SCOTUS nominee

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You obviously don’t have the knowledge to do other than rant and make false claims about a sitting judge.
Cite the cases and dispositions and show how they differ from other judges.
You apparently are of the belief that all SCOTUS decisions are unanimous and that disagreement among members of the bar in reading the law is impossible.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Which claim did I make which was false?

I don't think most SCOTUS decisions are unanimous, what on Earth would make you say that? I know unanimous decisions are rare, which is precisely why it shows how wrong Sotomayor has been, that she has been unanimously overruled.

But if you have 2 federal appeals judges, and one has never been overruled by the SC, and one has repeatedly been overruled by the SC (even unanimously), that tells me that one is better than the other.

And if one says that female Latinas are superior to white males, well, that statement would make you ineligible for jury duty, let alone being a supreme court judge. She's a lunatic, who has often been wrong on the law.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Which claim did I make which was false?

.

he likes to make stuff up then argue against himself...it makes him feel smarter

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Which claim did I make which was false?

I don't think most SCOTUS decisions are unanimous, what on Earth would make you say that? I know unanimous decisions are rare, which is precisely why it shows how wrong Sotomayor has been, that she has been unanimously overruled.

But if you have 2 federal appeals judges, and one has never been overruled by the SC, and one has repeatedly been overruled by the SC (even unanimously), that tells me that one is better than the other.

And if one says that female Latinas are superior to white males, well, that statement would make you ineligible for jury duty, let alone being a supreme court judge. She's a lunatic, who has often been wrong on the law.

You obviously don’t have the knowledge to do other than rant and make false claims about a sitting judge.
Cite the cases and dispositions and show how they differ from other judges.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You obviously don’t have the knowledge to do other than rant and make false claims about a sitting judge.
Cite the cases and dispositions and show how they differ from other judges.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yawn.

She was overturned by SCOTUS in 3 out of 5 cases where she wrote the majority opinion, and the SC reviewed it.

Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, which involved an inmate who sought to sue a private contractor operating a halfway house on behalf of the Bureau of Prisons over injuries he sustained. Sotomayor said he could, but a majority of the justices disagreed.

•In another case, Sotomayor wrote that under the Clean Water Act, the Environmental Protection Agency could not use a cost-benefit analysis to determine the best technology available for drawing cooling water into power plants with minimal impact on aquatic life. By a vote of 6-3 this year, the Supreme Court ruled otherwise in Entergy v. Riverkeeper (here, she brilliantly concluded that cost/benefit analyses are unconstitutional)

•The third reversal, in 2005, was a unanimous 8-0 decision in the case Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit. Sotomayor had written that a class action securities suit brought in state court by a broker/stockholder was not preempted by the 1998 Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act. But the high court’s opinion said it "would be odd, to say the least" if the law contained the exception that Sotomayor said it did.

OK? In the case where she was overturned unanimously (meaning Scalia, Ginsburg, and everyone in between said she was wrong), and they went so far as to call her conclusion "odd, to say the least".

Worthy of a promotion? Debatable.

Got anything else you want to say?

https://www.factcheck.org/2009/05/sotomayor-overturned/