|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
10-13-2020, 06:03 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Perhaps you should read the minority opinion of cases you think were decided incorrectly or are they only bad when you disagree with them then it’s legislating from the bench, not upholding the Constitution.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
if a bunch of white firefighters study their azzes off for a lieutenant test, and they happen to get the highest scores fair and square...on a test that the city paid facial consultants to ensure it wasn’t biased
in favor of whites...and the honkeys are denied the promotion based solely on their whiteness...how can that possibly be constitutional?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 09:19 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
if a bunch of white firefighters study their azzes off for a lieutenant test, and they happen to get the highest scores fair and square...on a test that the city paid facial consultants to ensure it wasn’t biased
in favor of whites...and the honkeys are denied the promotion based solely on their whiteness...how can that possibly be constitutional?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
White greviences are not in the constitution nor are white fire fighters mentioned so if your an originalist you cant use that argument
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 09:54 AM
|
#3
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,178
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
White greviences are not in the constitution nor are white fire fighters mentioned so if your an originalist you cant use that argument
|
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 10:17 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No kidding. Take a civics class for gods sake. Or take the time to read the constitution, instead of letting Rachael Maddow tell you what it says.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 10:16 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
White greviences are not in the constitution nor are white fire fighters mentioned so if your an originalist you cant use that argument
|
But anti discrimination laws are in the constitution. And the equal protection clause, means that everyone is free from discrimination, even white firefighters. This is news to you?.
You're having a rough time on this thread, you can't shred what I'm saying this time, you really can't.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 12:35 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
But anti discrimination laws are in the constitution. And the equal protection clause, means that everyone is free from discrimination, even white firefighters. This is news to you?.
You're having a rough time on this thread, you can't shred what I'm saying this time, you really can't.
|
seems you havent been paying attention
Marriage equality under threat from Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 12:41 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
seems you havent been paying attention
Marriage equality under threat from Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito
|
First, I am 100% in favor of gay marriage, and I was so when 96% of democrats still opposed it.
That being said, discrimination is what happens when you treat two things differently, when they are the same. For example, a white firefighter seeking a promotion and a black firefighter seeking a promotion, are similar, there's no logical basis to treat them differently (even though the liberals who run the city of New Haven, as well as the liberals on the SCOTUS, wanted them treated differently).
An argument can be made, that a heterosexual couple is meaningfully different than a homosexual couple, in that one can produce life (which we, you know, need in order to exist) and one cannot. Treating things differently when they are in fact different, could be construed as not being discriminatory.
I don't make that argument, but I see some merit in it.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 10:22 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
White greviences are not in the constitution nor are white fire fighters mentioned so if your an originalist you cant use that argument
|
You'd be hard-pressed to find a more constitutionally ignorant post on the entire Internet today.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 12:51 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,142
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
You'd be hard-pressed to find a more constitutionally ignorant post on the entire Internet today.
|
your the ignorant one who cant tell sarcasm from being serious
|
|
|
|
10-13-2020, 01:01 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
your the ignorant one who cant tell sarcasm from being serious
|
no one thought you were being sarcastic.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:31 PM.
|
| |