Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim neither Hamas nor Israel would exist with out the fear of destruction
Both use fear of the other to justify their methods. From building settlements to firing rockets
I look at like positional asphyxia
Israel has it knee on the Palestinians cutting of their air and in response they increase their struggles trying to breath , then Israel apply s more force to gain compliance and all they get it. More struggling
And round and round it Goes
As for you question are you serious? Israel is shooosed to respond exactly proportionately when attacked? Quick response is yes In most incidents you use enough force to stop the threat. Not to punish.. but Israel has a history of collective punishment.. which always comes into question when there so much infrastructure destroyed.. cell phone and civilian warnings look good for public relations not sure how effective it is at keeping non combatants safe
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Man.
Which side has a history of unprovoked violent attack a against the other, and which one uses violence after being attacked?
if someone punches you in the face, and you punch them back, those two things are not morally equivalent. not even close.
hamas doesn’t deny their goal is to wipe israel out of existnce. Israel wants to be left alone. not that israel is perfect, but theres no comparison. it’s like comparing the Nazis to the Poles in the 1930s.
forget about what each party’s line is, and just think. for two seconds, take off the blinders .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Threaded Mode