What Raiders coach should have done to avoid getting punished for emails

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim do you read your own posts ? if you posted this is Funny stuff. you would be correct but rather you posted

Funny stuff. And completely true.


And now you are shocked at the responses we all know you are 100% that it's completely true. no sarcasm

It is true. The emails were dismissed as Russian disinformation, then a year later Politico admits the emails were genuine. I'm not making that up, that's what happened. Social media giants were actively taking down mentions of Hunters emails by influential conservative voices.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

It is true. The emails were dismissed as Russian disinformation, then a year later Politico admits the emails were genuine. I'm not making that up, that's what happened. Social media giants were actively taking down mentions of Hunters emails by influential conservative voices.

Because it was the 11th hour in an election and everybody knew Russians were running misinformation campaigns to help Trump. Besides real or not, the story isn't there. So Hunter worked to profit off his name, big whoop, look at Trump's offspring.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Because it was the 11th hour in an election and everybody knew Russians were running misinformation campaigns to help Trump. Besides real or not, the story isn't there. So Hunter worked to profit off his name, big whoop, look at Trump's offspring.

so we should ignore potentially important news, if it might hurt democrats right before an election.

“real or not”

there is no more “or not”.

“look at grumps offspring”

who were wildly successful
before trump took office. Hunter was a pervert ( slept with his dead brothers widow) and loser ( impregnated a stripper, didn’t pay child support until a judge ordered him to). who knew he was also one of the worlds top artists as well? that’s not fishy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so we should ignore potentially important news, if it might hurt democrats right before an election.

Journalistic standards. Trump and his crony's were lying left and right, you can't give that equal treatment. Seriously Jim, look at the effing clown car that his campaign was.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Journalistic standards. Trump and his crony's were lying left and right, you can't give that equal treatment. Seriously Jim, look at the effing clown car that his campaign was.

The New York Post was lying left and right? The lefty media called the guy who confirmed what was in some of the emails, a Russian agent. Was there any evidence of that? Or is that what we now do to everyone who criticizes prominent democrats, like Hilary did to Tulsi Gabbard?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Journalistic standards. .

It's not journalistic standards to do what Politico did, and investigate whether the emails were valid, and then report honestly on what you found? Except maybe do it before the election, so that voters could decide if they wanted to consider that or not?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

It's not journalistic standards to do what Politico did, and investigate whether the emails were valid, and then report honestly on what you found? Except maybe do it before the election, so that voters could decide if they wanted to consider that or not?

They didn’t have the info at the time. Again though, confirming a few emails is irrelevant if they don’t show clear wrongdoing.

Are you thinking about maybe bidding on some artwork?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

They didn’t have the info at the time. Again though, confirming a few emails is irrelevant if they don’t show clear wrongdoing.

Are you thinking about maybe bidding on some artwork?

politico went and got the info because they investigated and confirmed.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device