Rittenhouse trial

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by scottw

yes, a kid who wasn't bothering anyone who happened to be armed shot a few "adults" who were attacking, threatening him and had a gun pointed at him and it's the fault of the kid who wasn't bothering anyone...

First I have to say this goes above and beyond the typical one line snarky post, but this is the only part I’d respond to. You ar3 the one who needs help with that fu*cked up perspective. So a teen carrying a weapon he couldn’t purchase and was illegally carrying goes across state lines to a two day running riot and he is there to not bother anyone, you clearly are wired directly into the far right news machine.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

First I have to say this goes above and beyond the typical one line snarky post, but this is the only part I’d respond to. You ar3 the one who needs help with that fu*cked up perspective. So a teen carrying a weapon he couldn’t purchase and was illegally carrying goes across state lines to a two day running riot and he is there to not bother anyone, you clearly are wired directly into the far right news machine.

he was there to help. he didn’t go there and start shooting.

if you put every dime you had into a business that was being destroyed over an event you had absolutely nothing to do with, and your elected officials refused to protect you for political reasons, what would you do?

if he had the gun illegally, he’ll get charged for that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

First I have to say this goes above and beyond the typical one line snarky post, but this is the only part I’d respond to. You ar3 the one who needs help with that fu*cked up perspective. So a teen carrying a weapon he couldn’t purchase and was illegally carrying goes across state lines to a two day running riot and he is there to not bother anyone, you clearly are wired directly into the far right news machine.

Yes. He still wasn’t bothering anyone and there is no evidence that he threatened anyone. Didn’t he encounter some police during the time he was there helping? You’d think if he was doing something illegal or threatening people with a weapon he’d have been arrested….
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by scottw

Yes. He still wasn’t bothering anyone and there is no evidence that he threatened anyone. Didn’t he encounter some police during the time he was there helping? You’d think if he was doing something illegal or threatening people with a weapon he’d have been arrested….
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I knew you couldn’t answer the question honestly.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

I knew you couldn’t answer the question honestly.

What was the question?

You made a statement…


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

I knew you couldn’t answer the question honestly.

you didn’t answer mine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

you didn’t answer mine.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Tell me which property Rittenhouse was protecting that he owned or had a vested interest in?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Tell me which property Rittenhouse was protecting that he owned or had a vested interest in?

how many questions of yours must i answer, before you answer one of mine?

where does it say one can only protect property they own? where does it say one cannot help out someone else?

my god man. you’re saying it’s a character flaw to do something for someone else. jesus. how do you arrive at something that twisted?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device