when you can’t win according to the rules, throw a tantrum and change the rules…

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

has nothing to do with religion. i’ve been opposed to infanticide longer than i’ve been catholic.

if the baby is a person, then abortion is murder. therefore, that’s literally the only issue surrounding abortion. nothing else matters. every other aspect of the debate is a meaningless distraction. because if that baby is human, abortion is infanticide. this is why liberals will do anything to avoid discussing this detail, when it’s really all that matters. so it’s not just a religious question that has no place in setting policy. it’s vital.

that was a weak argument even for you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

As a woman said:
That is why I have maintained my "save the zygote if you want after removing it" stance. If life begins at conception, carefully remove it from my body, and place it in an incubator. Good luck in its survival
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

As a woman said:
That is why I have maintained my "save the zygote if you want after removing it" stance. If life begins at conception, carefully remove it from my body, and place it in an incubator. Good luck in its survival
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

that’s one argument it’s a very self centered, sick argument in my opinion.

would that woman be ok with abortion bans after viability then?

i know you don’t like
answering questions, but here goes…when would you consider it a human being?

the developing baby is the same one day as it is the next. so unless you say life begins at conception, it seems illogical
and arbitrary to pick some random date and say life begins here. doesn’t make sense to me. curious to know your answer.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device