|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-02-2022, 10:31 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
There was an allegation against Kavanaugh, and also against Biden. Should we investigate both? or only investigate allegations against republicans?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Shows the hypocrisy of the R.
Yes, let's investigate - but do a real investigation.
|
I'm guessing you missed my response otherwise why ask about investigating both?
Hard to investigate a President but if the SC nominee has credible claims against them then by all means investigate - and as I said a "but do a real investigation" not the shame the Rs did with Kavanaugh
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 11:07 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I'm guessing you missed my response otherwise why ask about investigating both?
Hard to investigate a President but if the SC nominee has credible claims against them then by all means investigate - and as I said a "but do a real investigation" not the shame the Rs did with Kavanaugh
|
“credible”. yup. a very broken person making politically convenient, yet unbelievably vague allegations with massive holes in it.
Why did Feinstein wait until
the very end of Kavanaugh’s first round of hearings, to break the story? She had the allegation all along. Other than for political drama and political impact, what possible reason was there for her to sit on it for a week?
i don’t know when the rape happened, i do t know where it happened, i never told
anyone about it, i don’t know how i got home, can’t name a single
other person who was at the party, but i know who did it.
reeks of credibility.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 11:14 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
“credible”. yup. a very broken person making politically convenient, yet unbelievably vague allegations with massive holes in it.
Why did Feinstein wait until
the very end of Kavanaugh’s first round of hearings, to break the story? She had the allegation all along. Other than for political drama and political impact, what possible reason was there for her to sit on it for a week?
i don’t know when the rape happened, i do t know where it happened, i never told
anyone about it, i don’t know how i got home, can’t name a single
other person who was at the party, but i know who did it.
reeks of credibility.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Should have been easy to disprove then - right? There were lots of witness' who were never interviewed or contacted after they contacted the FBI to say they had info.
So back to your other post
it’s “hypocrisy” if the gop exactly replicates the democrats tactics. i see.
What exact tactics did the Ds do that the Rs "replicated" since it seems like the Rs have a long history of limiting who should be considered for the SC but when the Ds do it the Rs get their panties all in a bunch?
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 12:08 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Should have been easy to disprove then - right? There were lots of witness' who were never interviewed or contacted after they contacted the FBI to say they had info.
So back to your other post
it’s “hypocrisy” if the gop exactly replicates the democrats tactics. i see.
What exact tactics did the Ds do that the Rs "replicated" since it seems like the Rs have a long history of limiting who should be considered for the SC but when the Ds do it the Rs get their panties all in a bunch?
|
"Should have been easy to disprove then - right?"
No, in fact. Almost impossible to disprove. How does Kavanaugh prove that he didn't rape her in a room at someone's house, 35 years ago?
It was an asinine allegation. The one against Boden, at least, was brought by someone who told people back when it happened, that she was raped by a US Senator. That's waaaay more credibility than Ford had.
I feel sorry for her, don't want anything bad to happen to her. But her story is a joke.
"What exact tactics did the Ds do that the Rs "replicated""
I said that the GOP should claim that Bidens nominee raped someone 35 years ago. That would be replicating the lefts tactics.
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 12:31 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"Should have been easy to disprove then - right?"
No, in fact. Almost impossible to disprove. How does Kavanaugh prove that he didn't rape her in a room at someone's house, 35 years ago?
It was an asinine allegation. The one against Boden, at least, was brought by someone who told people back when it happened, that she was raped by a US Senator. That's waaaay more credibility than Ford had.
I feel sorry for her, don't want anything bad to happen to her. But her story is a joke.
"What exact tactics did the Ds do that the Rs "replicated""
I said that the GOP should claim that Bidens nominee raped someone 35 years ago. That would be replicating the lefts tactics.
|
Ford's therapists notes backed her story. Ford passed a polygraph administered by a former FBI agent and while not admissible in court law enforcement uses them. She did not want to go public.
So you have nothing. I demonstrated the R's hypocrisy in picking of SC justices and you have nothing.
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 12:43 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Ford's therapists notes backed her story. Ford passed a polygraph administered by a former FBI agent and while not admissible in court law enforcement uses them. She did not want to go public.
So you have nothing. I demonstrated the R's hypocrisy in picking of SC justices and you have nothing.
|
it’s all just a coincidence that after decades, the story broke when it did.
gimme a break.
“so you have nothing.”.
i have everything. The Kavanaugh allegation was dismissed and he’s on that court for life, and no sane person thinks he’s a serial rapist. I have everything.
your side assumed
kavanaugh was guilty and won’t consider that Biden might be guilty. that’s hypocrisy too.
he has daughters and he coached their basketball teams, and not a whisper about anything improper.
But Bill Clinton is a hero on the left. An absolute hero.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 12:47 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
it’s all just a coincidence that after decades, the story broke when it did.
You do understand he was being nominated for the USSC right.
gimme a break.
i have everything. The Kavanaugh allegation was dismissed and he’s on that court for life, and no sane person thinks he’s a serial rapist. I have everything.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No, you don't have anything. The thread is about the R's hypocrisy in crying about Biden saying he will nominate a Black woman yet have a history of doing basically the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.
|
| |