Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
again, what does it say that you cannot EVER answer the question that i asked?
no republican ever said that ( hearing voices again). what they’re saying, is that it’s wrong ( and obviously illegal) to ignore potentially better candidates based on gender and skin color
Lindsay Graham has come out and said that there’s one black woman a bunch or republicans would vote for.
I dare you to post evidence that any influential republican said that no black roman is qualified.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Jim keep convincing yourself Republicans push back against a Black SJC pick is about “ a better candidate “
Just like changing for voter laws were for “ election integrity “ even in states Trump won. More like they are afraid of Turn out.
Texas counties reject unprecedented numbers of mail ballots ahead of March 1 primary under restrictive new law
To be eligible to vote early by mail in Texas, you must:
be 65 years or older;
be sick or disabled;
be out of the county on election day and during the period for early voting by personal appearance; or
be expected to give birth within three weeks before or after Election Day; or
be confined in jail, but otherwise eligible.
These must be the fraudsters Texas is after , most over 65 I would bet vote Republican
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device[/QUOTE]
i answered that question exactly as it was asked. i’m
sorry if you couldn’t comprehend it, but here is the answer again….no influential republican ever said that. To repeat, no influential republican said anything close to what pete claimed they are saying.
If there’s a highly qualified black female candidate, fine. buts it’s discrimination to say ahead of time that you’re excluding a huge number of people based on skin color and gender. How is that not discrimination?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Threaded Mode