Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim it is not the state’s responsibility to enforce federal law.. they don’t get paid by the federal government to do it so most states don’t..
So much for states Rights
And you have no idea what a sanctuary city even means outside your conservative indoctrinated meaning you think or believe that it refers to a city that doesn’t prosecute immigrants,
generally speaking, it’s a city (or a county, or a state) that limits its cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agents in order to protect low-priority immigrants from deportation, while still turning over those who have committed serious crimes
So in a nut shell illegal immigration is a misdemeanor And states won’t waste resources on non violent offenders
sanctuary cities see 15% less crime than non-sanctuary cities.
For 7th Consecutive Year, Visa Overstays Exceeded Illegal Border Crossings
people who overstayed their visas accounted for 62 percent of the newly undocumented, while 38 percent had crossed a border illegally.
Omg how could conservatives be lying to Their sheep
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/16/68605...rder-crossings
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
i never came CLOSE to saying the states had the responsibility to enforce federal law. but it looks like blue states are going out of their way to violate federal
law, and that’s different. and the supremacy clause seems to say they can’t do that.
you’re saying states aren’t responsible for federal law, and i agree.
please tell me, then, why texans should have to spend $1 billion a year because the federal government chooses to have open borders, while liberals in MN and VT pay just about nothing. how is that fair to texans?
If citizens of Mass can reject federal
laws banning weed, why can’t i reject federal laws saying i must pay federal income tax? who gets to decide which of us can break federal laws,,and which of us can’t?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Threaded Mode