RIOT, ahem, Protest Season 2022 in 3, 2, xx

[Pete F.]

The people who oppose womens right to control their own bodies fail to acknowledge that at a minimum their are other faiths that do not oppose abortion but in fact require it in some cases.
Imposing beliefs that are held by some Faiths on all Americans is unconstitutional.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Picture says it all.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Picture says it all.

lemme ask you, if abortion is restricted, yes that will be hard on moms no question. and your side makes that clear.

is there anything else that happens, when abortion is not chosen? other than moms having to endure something admittedly difficult, is there anything GOOD that happens as a result of child birth? Can you think of anything positive? Anything? A baby being born means absolutely nothing to you? Not worth mentioning? Not a syllable? that’s very telling, about how slanted this issue is framed.

As always, your side will only talk about the impact to the mom. and that’s an important part of this, but it’s not all of it. the impact to the baby is also part of this, and your side hates admitting that or considering it for a second.

Why are so many people
moving to red states, do you think? NH, TN, NC, SC, TX, FL? If those states are run by people
who are so barbaric, why are people
moving there?

When you live in a place with low taxes that put hundreds of dollars in your pocket a
month ( or more) yiu don’t need, or want, the state to provide some of those things.

Pre exiting condition coverage is a terrific idea, sincerely. that was a real winner for them, and they deserve the reward.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

The people who oppose womens right to control their own bodies fail to acknowledge that at a minimum their are other faiths that do not oppose abortion but in fact require it in some cases.
Imposing beliefs that are held by some Faiths on all Americans is unconstitutional.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There are some faiths that require killing women who blaspheme the faith or are sexually promiscuous. Imposing those beliefs on all Americans is unconstitutional.

If people, persons, human beings, want to live in this country, they should obey its laws.

If women controlled their own bodies, the vast majority of abortions would not be needed.

If our laws would stipulate that women, or men, or persons, or human beings, must totally control their own bodies, should they be punished when they don't control their own bodies? When not controlling their bodies leads to harming other bodies? Or does controlling your own body mean you can do whatever you wish, without interference by laws and government and society.

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by detbuch

There are some faiths that require killing women who blaspheme the faith or are sexually promiscuous. Imposing those beliefs on all Americans is unconstitutional.

If people, persons, human beings, want to live in this country, they should obey its laws.

If women controlled their own bodies, the vast majority of abortions would not be needed.

If our laws would stipulate that women, or men, or persons, or human beings, must totally control their own bodies, should they be punished when they don't control their own bodies? When not controlling their bodies leads to harming other bodies? Or does controlling your own body mean you can do whatever you wish, without interference by laws and government and society.

Nobody is trying to impose those rules on all Americans.
Nobody is saying anyone is required to get an abortion
This country has a constitution that separates church and state.
Our law’s constitutionally should not be representative of a religious belief.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device