Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
So in your argument for why, are you also going to suggest we should have left slavery to be decided at the state level.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
(1)
your side wanted slavery decided at the state level. My side sacrificed hundreds of thousands of lives to stop it.
(2) slavery was obviously unconstitutional. Abortion restrictions are pretty obviously not unconstitutional.
(3) the supreme court upheld slavery and segregation, those stupid decisions were eventually overturned. Your side is now saying that precedent should be respected, so are you saying it was wrong for future courts to do away with slavery and segregation (championed, again, by your side)? Is it always wrong to overturn precedents? That's what your side is saying now, that it's wrong to overturn precedents.
I can literally feel your tin foil hat getting tighter, and I can literally hear the voices in your head getting louder and angrier. Probably going to be a rough few months for you.
Threaded Mode