|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
08-19-2022, 08:22 AM
|
#1
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
WHen did Wray say Thibault had no connection whatsoever to Hunter Biden? He was the assistant special agent in charge of the DC office until recently, now he's on leave. Shocker.
|
The investigation is/was being conducted out of the Baltimore field office by a rump appointee....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Bryan, what does it say to you, that all of big tech and the lefty media buried this story until the election (saying that anyone who discussed it was spreading Russian disinformation), and then after the election, they all said "oh by the way, it was legit". Is that all a random coincidence? Or was it obviously an attempt to help Biden win?
|
Did they want Trump to win when the announced the Hillary investigation <2 weeks before the election?
Or, maybe there should have been/should be a heavy dose of skepticism with a blind laptop repair guy across the country, who just happened to have a laptop? Why did Barr work to keep the investigation into Hunter quiet? Did he want Trump to lose?
Even recently, I had read a Wash Post article where they could verify some of the emails are real, but a vast majority of the data had been so mishandled by the folks that now have the laptop, that the authenticity of some of it/much of it cant be verified.
All of that comes back to the fact that Hunter is clearly a scumbag. Full stop. He has a drug problem and is likely pretty amoral. He traded on his dads name to make a lot of money. So did/do the Trump kids. Does it suck, yes. On both sides.
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 08:28 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
The investigation is/was being conducted out of the Baltimore field office by a rump appointee....
Did they want Trump to win when the announced the Hillary investigation <2 weeks before the election?
Or, maybe there should have been/should be a heavy dose of skepticism with a blind laptop repair guy across the country, who just happened to have a laptop? Why did Barr work to keep the investigation into Hunter quiet? Did he want Trump to lose?
Even recently, I had read a Wash Post article where they could verify some of the emails are real, but a vast majority of the data had been so mishandled by the folks that now have the laptop, that the authenticity of some of it/much of it cant be verified.
All of that comes back to the fact that Hunter is clearly a scumbag. Full stop. He has a drug problem and is likely pretty amoral. He traded on his dads name to make a lot of money. So did/do the Trump kids. Does it suck, yes. On both sides.
|
i’ve said trump is morally bankrupt. I believe the bidens are as well, all
kinds of evidence that’s the case.
yes it sucks on both sides. However, The DOJ and the media and big tech aren’t treating both sides the same.
you have a totally valid point about the hilary investigation two weeks before the election, that didn’t help her. but she had that coming.
trump is corrupt, and is being investigated by everybody. fine
the bidens have it coming, and are getting a free pass. Joe, who once said we need to believe al women ( when kavanaughs head was in the block) has a rape allegation against him. And there’s all kinds of evidence of shady influence peddling. But we aren’t supposed to talk about it ( it’s russian disinformation!), and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 08:31 AM
|
#3
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,408
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So... Why didn't Barr look into it??? OR, maybe they did and there is no 'there' there...
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 09:54 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND
So... Why didn't Barr look into it??? OR, maybe they did and there is no 'there' there...
|
yes bryan, i’m sure the DOJ thoroughly and impartially investigated Hunter and Joe, concluded they did nothing wrong, and then nobody said anything about it. It didn’t get to the media. Or even more likely, maybe the DOJ told CNN and MSNBC that the Bidens were squeaky clean, but CNN and MSNBC chose not to mention it on the air because they didn’t want to appear to be showing favoritism to the Bidens.
I’m certain that’s exactly what happened.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 03:17 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,371
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
i’ve said trump is morally bankrupt. I believe the bidens are as well, all
kinds of evidence that’s the case.
yes it sucks on both sides. However, The DOJ and the media and big tech aren’t treating both sides the same.
you have a totally valid point about the hilary investigation two weeks before the election, that didn’t help her. but she had that coming.
trump is corrupt, and is being investigated by everybody. fine
the bidens have it coming, and are getting a free pass. Joe, who once said we need to believe al women ( when kavanaughs head was in the block) has a rape allegation against him. And there’s all kinds of evidence of shady influence peddling. But we aren’t supposed to talk about it ( it’s russian disinformation!), and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Yep you totally ignored Rockhound and the laptop. And are convinced the FBI and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it.
Because you see or hear the outcome you want..
you have a totally valid point about the hilary investigation two weeks before the election, that didn’t help her. but she had that coming.
Yep . there it is ! You agree but a quick Flop flop . to see had it coming so you’re ok with it anyway
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Last edited by wdmso; 08-19-2022 at 03:24 PM..
|
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 03:43 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Yep you totally ignored Rockhound and the laptop. And are convinced the FBI and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it.
Because you see or hear the outcome you want..
you have a totally valid point about the hilary investigation two weeks before the election, that didn’t help her. but she had that coming.
Yep . there it is ! You agree but a quick Flop flop . to see had it coming so you’re ok with it anyway
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"you totally ignored Rockhound and the laptop."
What did I ignore? Please be specific?
"are convinced the FBI and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it."
If the FBI was looking into it, Wray might have said something when he was just questioned about it. Why would they look into something that's all "Russian disinformation", anyway?
"you see or hear the outcome you want"
Right, which is why I was sure Trump would lose in 2016, why I think the GOP is doing a godawful job of campaigning right now.
We can't all be as honest and impartial as you are.
|
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 03:46 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"you totally ignored Rockhound and the laptop."
What did I ignore? Please be specific?
"are convinced the FBI and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it."
If the FBI was looking into it, Wray might have said something when he was just questioned about it. Why would they look into something that's all "Russian disinformation", anyway?
"you see or hear the outcome you want"
Right, which is why I was sure Trump would lose in 2016, why I think the GOP is doing a godawful job of campaigning right now.
We can't all be as honest and impartial as you are.
|
That's something, coming from a guy who denies that the Minneapolis teacher contract has anything to do with race, because the word "race" isn't in the language. Give me a break, you have less than zero credibility.
|
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 06:00 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,371
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
That's something, coming from a guy who denies that the Minneapolis teacher contract has anything to do with race, because the word "race" isn't in the language. Give me a break, you have less than zero credibility.
|
1st
I wasn’t the butt hurt person who started the thread. About a contract the teachers themselves approved
2nd race isn’t mentioned . It covers all marginalized groups.. I listed some of those groups earlier like veterans
3rd you avoid his laptop comments like the plague .. I think I also mentioned a little thing called chain of custody the blind guy and a bunch of other reasons why any prosecutors worth their salt would see that laptop as Kryptonite
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
08-19-2022, 07:46 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
1st
I wasn’t the butt hurt person who started the thread. About a contract the teachers themselves approved
2nd race isn’t mentioned . It covers all marginalized groups.. I listed some of those groups earlier like veterans
3rd you avoid his laptop comments like the plague .. I think I also mentioned a little thing called chain of custody the blind guy and a bunch of other reasons why any prosecutors worth their salt would see that laptop as Kryptonite
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
you criticized me for flip flopping topics. but its ok when you do it because of course everything is ok when the left does it.
i asked you, specifically what i ignored. your answer is gibberish
you’re the only idiot here who claims that contract isn’t about race. As TDF said, the progressives are bragging that it will
he used to fire whites first.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
08-20-2022, 12:16 AM
|
#10
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,425
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"you totally ignored Rockhound and the laptop."
What did I ignore? Please be specific?
"are convinced the FBI and for sure the DOJ isn’t looking at it."
If the FBI was looking into it, Wray might have said something when he was just questioned about it. Why would they look into something that's all "Russian disinformation", anyway?
"you see or hear the outcome you want"
Right, which is why I was sure Trump would lose in 2016, why I think the GOP is doing a godawful job of campaigning right now.
We can't all be as honest and impartial as you are.
|
This is especially important since Hunter worked in the White House for four years even though he was rejected for a security clearance and then later got a $2 billion investment from the Saudis ... oh wait
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
08-20-2022, 01:52 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,463
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
This is especially important since Hunter worked in the White House for four years even though he was rejected for a security clearance and then later got a $2 billion investment from the Saudis ... oh wait
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Flip flop often confuses kids.
|
|
|
|
08-20-2022, 04:45 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
If the FBI was looking into it,
.
|
if the FBI was looking into it...they'd be leaking info to the Washington Post and NY Times 
|
|
|
|
08-20-2022, 06:50 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,690
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
if the FBI was looking into it...they'd be leaking info to the Washington Post and NY Times 
|
Like they leaked the fact they were going to raid mar-A-lago. Oh wait.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
08-20-2022, 07:05 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Like they leaked the fact they were going to raid mar-A-lago. Oh wait.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
c'mon, you know they didn't want to alert trump that they were coming to confiscate melania's panties, they hate trump....but they'd definitely give hunter and the big guy the head's up so they could hide the crack, guns and hookers
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 AM.
|
| |