|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-17-2023, 06:46 PM
|
#1
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,620
|
Yup proven cult member, even evidence won’t change your mind, it’s the MAGA way. I suspect even if he is charged and found guilty, will will think it was all political and the irony is they tried to erase the votes of countless Americans…….so constitutional right.
|
|
|
|
01-17-2023, 06:52 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Yup proven cult member, even evidence won’t change your mind, it’s the MAGA way. I suspect even if he is charged and found guilty, will will think it was all political and the irony is they tried to erase the votes of countless Americans…….so constitutional right.
|
Actually, you sound like a cult member. You're for conviction before a trial.
|
|
|
|
01-17-2023, 09:54 PM
|
#3
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,426
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Actually, you sound like a cult member. You're for conviction before a trial.
|
If that’s the definition of cult members, I haven’t heard rallies led by Democrats chanting “lock him up” , “hang Mike Pence” or Democrats leading those or similar chants.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
01-17-2023, 11:09 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
If that’s the definition of cult members, I haven’t heard rallies led by Democrats chanting “lock him up” , “hang Mike Pence” or Democrats leading those or similar chants.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
It's not a definition. And there's a whole lot of things you haven't heard, and that you refuse to hear when they stare you in the face--which fits in very well with your perverted notion that speech should be censured if it frightens or threatens what you prefer to believe. It's your three monkey way of creating the brave new world that conforms to your closed-minded world of supposedly benevolent chaos.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 07:53 AM
|
#5
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,426
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
It's not a definition. And there's a whole lot of things you haven't heard, and that you refuse to hear when they stare you in the face--which fits in very well with your perverted notion that speech should be censured if it frightens or threatens what you prefer to believe. It's your three monkey way of creating the brave new world that conforms to your closed-minded world of supposedly benevolent chaos.
|
Ahh Saul, I see how you play it….
Goebbels would be proud
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 08:15 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Ahh Saul, I see how you play it….
Goebbels would be proud
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Ahh, blah-blah-blah
|
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 07:37 AM
|
#7
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Actually, you sound like a cult member. You're for conviction before a trial.
|
I actually think the Jan 6th committee pulled so much evidence in interviews, emails, texts and video evidence, it was in my opinion (which by the way I asked you for before you dodged), was the essence of a trial. The only things missing was a judge and defense attorney and as a member of this jury, I vote guilty on multiple counts for Trump against the will of the people and his inner circle of nuts thinking they could keep Trump in power. You feel free to play the part of the defense team and show us evidence proving otherwise, good luck.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 08:20 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
I actually think the Jan 6th committee pulled so much evidence in interviews, emails, texts and video evidence, it was in my opinion (which by the way I asked you for before you dodged), was the essence of a trial. The only things missing was a judge and defense attorney and as a member of this jury, I vote guilty on multiple counts for Trump against the will of the people and his inner circle of nuts thinking they could keep Trump in power. You feel free to play the part of the defense team and show us evidence proving otherwise, good luck.
|
"The only things missing was a judge and defense attorney" and an actual sworn in and vetted jury. Like a Kangaroo Court.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 08:33 AM
|
#9
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
"The only things missing was a judge and defense attorney" and an actual sworn in and vetted jury. Like a Kangaroo Court.
|
Deflection and a non answer, we are all waiting for your defense, I guess all the testimony was coerced, all the texts and emails fabricated and the videos photo shopped. I know there was no insurrection, those were peaceful protesters and Trump and his expert legal crew were only attempting strictly legal avenues to change the results and I know it was all constitutional.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 09:06 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Deflection and a non answer, we are all waiting for your defense, I guess all the testimony was coerced, all the texts and emails fabricated and the videos photo shopped. I know there was no insurrection, those were peaceful protesters and Trump and his expert legal crew were only attempting strictly legal avenues to change the results and I know it was all constitutional.
|
I answered using your own words. There was no actual trial with defense attorneys to question, cross examine, and rebut. When and if that happens, depending on the jurisdiction, etc., we can have at least somewhat of a clearer and fairer understanding of what happened.
An "investigation" by Congress can be more politically oriented by a controlling party which selects who and what is said and what is allowed. The hyper political atmosphere that Jan6 created, and the one-sided representation of the committee running the investigation, does not instill in me any confidence in the process and outcome.
|
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 10:17 AM
|
#11
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,426
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I answered using your own words. There was no actual trial with defense attorneys to question, cross examine, and rebut. When and if that happens, depending on the jurisdiction, etc., we can have at least somewhat of a clearer and fairer understanding of what happened.
|
“Depending on the jurisdiction, etc.”
Hopefully it’s coming, but you’ll still spin it…..because truth isn’t truth and there’s alternative facts.
And by the way from the WaPo
“Congressional investigators found evidence that tech platforms — especially Twitter — failed to heed their own employees’ warnings about violent rhetoric on their platforms and bent their rules to avoid penalizing conservatives,” particularly Trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
01-18-2023, 10:45 AM
|
#12
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,620
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I answered using your own words. There was no actual trial with defense attorneys to question, cross examine, and rebut. When and if that happens, depending on the jurisdiction, etc., we can have at least somewhat of a clearer and fairer understanding of what happened.
An "investigation" by Congress can be more politically oriented by a controlling party which selects who and what is said and what is allowed. The hyper political atmosphere that Jan6 created, and the one-sided representation of the committee running the investigation, does not instill in me any confidence in the process and outcome.
|
Another deflection, are you not able to voice your opinion of whether Trump and his inner circle committed crimes? You have voiced your opinion on almost everything else, we have all enjoyed or been forced to endure your sesquipedalian speeches on a multitude of topics.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 PM.
|
| |