I think Crafty's post shows exactly why this whole thing is a bad idea.
His list of ten of S-B's "senior officers" includes 5 guys who don't even have 100 posts under their belt here. 4 are less than 50 and 3 don't even have 30 posts.
Give me a break!
Its exactly this type of potential selection and more importantly exclusion to both the HOF and the now proposed "Selection Committee" that will lead to the trouble I'm calling Pandoras Box and exactly what we don't need here at S-B.
Threaded Mode